Author Topic: OS X 10.4.4 cracked for PCs  (Read 7313 times)

Xeniczone

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 76
  • Kudos: 0
Re: OS X 10.4.4 cracked for PCs
« Reply #30 on: 2 March 2006, 05:29 »
Quote
2. ARE YOU SMOKING CRACK? MY MOTHER BOARD SUPPORTS UPTO AN FX-60!
3. In case you havent noticed x1900 XT pwns 7800GTX 512 and the x1900 is $200 cheaper at that! BF2 runs fine maxed out. but EAs shitty code makes the shitty game NFS:MW run like shit. Its only the ATI mac cards that suck. The regular PC one sare very powerful, like the x800s.

How can a motherboard with a amd 3000+ with a socket 754 support a FX-60 with a socket 939. That is just impossible. You really don't know what your talking about sorry.
 
ATI mac cards are the same chipset as the x86 versions. So how can this be. Does it mean you want to say ATI sucks or Do you not know again what your talking about.
 
core clock of a x1900xtx is only 640mhz while the mem. clock is 1550mhz price 639
core clock of a 7800GTX is only 430mhz while the memory clock is 1200mhz price 409
Sorry your right for once congraduations. BUT speed wise... If i had the choose between 2 great graphics cards like these I would go with nVidia saveing 230 dollors because of a couple of mhz no skin of my bones. And why does it matter you stupid graphic card was a x800 I was talking about it not the unafordible x1900xtx.

Quote
And you saying my system is shit when you got the worst video card in the history of nvidia!
 Once again you are refering to my x86 computer that hasn't been upgraded seen it came out. how sad. I've gone mac seens then.
 
Quote
Srry bout that. I was mad at Xeniczone lack of knowledge

That is odd you were only right about one thing and we were on different card there I was refering to your x800 and you were refering to the x1900xtx that you didn't mention before or have so I guess im sorry for that I'm not sorry for owning your ass by proving you wrong.

Lead Head

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,508
  • Kudos: 534
Re: OS X 10.4.4 cracked for PCs
« Reply #31 on: 2 March 2006, 05:45 »
Quote from: Xeniczone
How can a motherboard with a amd 3000+ with a socket 754 support a FX-60 with a socket 939. That is just impossible. You really don't know what your talking about sorry.

You are a dip shit. I have a socket 939 board!
 
Quote
ATI mac cards are the same chipset as the x86 versions. So how can this be. Does it mean you want to say ATI sucks or Do you not know again what your talking about.
 
core clock of a x1900xtx is only 640mhz while the mem. clock is 1550mhz price 639
core clock of a 7800GTX is only 430mhz while the memory clock is 1200mhz price 409
Sorry your right for once congraduations. BUT speed wise... If i had the choose between 2 great graphics cards like these I would go with nVidia saveing 230 dollors because of a couple of mhz no skin of my bones. And why does it matter you stupid graphic card was a x800 I was talking about it not the unafordible x1900xtx.

Wow. You are a complete dipshit. The x1900 XTX is around $570. They are COMPLETLY DIFFERENT ARCHITECTURES!. The x1900 XTX is around 1.5 to 2k higher in 3D mark 05 then the 7800 GTX 512. its about 3-4k Faster the the 7800GTX 256MB. In case you havent noticed the 7800 GTX 512 is around$750!!!! and the x1900 XT can be held as low/lower then $499 and spanks both of nvidias high end offerings.

Quote
Once again you are refering to my x86 computer that hasn't been upgraded seen it came out. how sad. I've gone mac seens then.

Very well then.

 
Quote
That is odd you were only right about one thing and we were on different card there I was refering to your x800 and you were refering to the x1900xtx that you didn't mention before or have so I guess im sorry for that I'm not sorry for owning your ass by proving you wrong.

Hmm well. Thats why my x800 unlocked to 16 pipes and OCed to x850 XT PE speeds gets roughly 6.4k in 3D mark 05. Thats more then a 6800 Ultra!
sig.

mobrien_12

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,138
  • Kudos: 711
    • http://www.geocities.com/mobrien_12
Re: OS X 10.4.4 cracked for PCs
« Reply #32 on: 2 March 2006, 06:26 »
When someone starts talking like an absolute authority but makes mistakes, or starts speaking about controversial things as if they were definite facts, he can really irritate people.  This is especially true with posts and email where it is easy to read arrogance or other emotional context into printed words without facial expressions or voice tone.    

Discussions are good.  Talking with people is good.  Talking at people is bad.  

Deep breath guys.  Have fun.
In brightest day, in darkest night, no evil shall escape my sight....

Xeniczone

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 76
  • Kudos: 0
Re: OS X 10.4.4 cracked for PCs
« Reply #33 on: 2 March 2006, 13:43 »
Quote
You are a dip shit. I have a socket 939 board!

and you have a amd 3000+

Your a lier you can't put a 3000+ with a different socket in a 939 socket. Now calm down.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16814195003

They don't even make 512mb versions of it. So... There is no point in 512mbs anyway. a game only requires 128mbs max. then you will need an extra 128mbs just for what windows or anyother app your running takes up.

Quote
They are COMPLETLY DIFFERENT ARCHITECTURES!.

Mac ati graphic cards are no different then the x86 version they use the same chipset.

H_TeXMeX_H

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,988
  • Kudos: 494
    • http://draconishinobi.50webs.com/
Re: OS X 10.4.4 cracked for PCs
« Reply #34 on: 2 March 2006, 20:32 »
Quote from: mobrien_12
When someone starts talking like an absolute authority but makes mistakes, or starts speaking about controversial things as if they were definite facts, he can really irritate people.  This is especially true with posts and email where it is easy to read arrogance or other emotional context into printed words without facial expressions or voice tone.    

Discussions are good.  Talking with people is good.  Talking at people is bad.  

Deep breath guys.  Have fun.

Somehow I find that these kinds of arguments escalate uncontrollably ... I mean no matter what you say, it just won't stop ... but why bother stopping it, just watch people duke it out ...

Quote
Arguing on the internet is like running in the Special Olympics... Even if you win, you're still retarded.

http://carcino.gen.nz/images/index.php/00b9a680/463c5922

You might say that's mean ... but it's damn funny too :D

Lead Head

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,508
  • Kudos: 534
Re: OS X 10.4.4 cracked for PCs
« Reply #35 on: 2 March 2006, 21:43 »
Quote from: Xeniczone
and you have a amd 3000+

Your a lier you can't put a 3000+ with a different socket in a 939 socket. Now calm down.
You are a moron. AMD MADE SOCKET 939 A64 3000s A FEW MONTHS AGO WHEN I BUILT THIS SYSTEM!

Quote

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16814195003

They don't even make 512mb versions of it. So... There is no point in 512mbs anyway. a game only requires 128mbs max. then you will need an extra 128mbs just for what windows or anyother app your running takes up.


Mac ati graphic cards are no different then the x86 version they use the same chipset.

This just proves my point. I was comapring the 7800 to x1900. You are a moron if you think 128MB is enough! 256MB is the standard! Most games take up aroun 300-500MB worth of textures! nVidia released the 7800 GTX 512MB to compete with the x1800 because it was beating the regular GTX. Then the x1900 came out and crushed and pulverrized iAnd you would be a complete moron to get a 7800GTX now. Considering x1800 XTs with still beat the 256MB version can be held alot cheaper. nVidia right now is losing in the graphics card war. Like I said. You are a moon if you think the 7800 and x1900 architecture are the same. Clock speeds and pixel generally dont mean shit anymore. Its all about shader power now, witch the x1900 has and the GTX doesnt.


Ok i am done arguing with this moron.


Another note here are some pics of my CPU.
And nVidia discontinued the 7800GTX 512 because it was extreme short in supply, not because people were buying them because nVidia only made like 2000 7800 GTX 512s, because nVidia had trouble getting a lot of the cores upto the right speed and memory problems as well



[verwijderd door de beheerder]
sig.

cymon

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 354
  • Kudos: 172
Re: OS X 10.4.4 cracked for PCs
« Reply #36 on: 2 March 2006, 22:07 »
I see two things wrong with that picture.

1. Gigabyte motherboard.
2. 4 sticks of RAM. I'm sure you've heard that using an A64 processor with four sticks drops you down to 2T command rate. Hope you didn't bother getting fast RAM.

And I really hope that IDE cable is only hooked up to a CD drive...

Lead Head

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,508
  • Kudos: 534
Re: OS X 10.4.4 cracked for PCs
« Reply #37 on: 2 March 2006, 22:20 »
Actually gigabyte mother baords are rock stable if you dont O/C. I am well aware that running 4 sticks of ram lowers performence. Thats why i rasis the FSB and drop the muoltiplier down. And plus i have no need for an SATA drive. My IDE drive suits me just fine.
about 60mb/s average and 80 mb/s burst. really come on. Is there a big difference between 133Mbpa UATA and 150 SATA? Please...Like I said gigabyte motherboards are awsome if you dont OC.

I originally had 512MB PC3200 now i have 1GB PC3200.
sig.

cymon

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 354
  • Kudos: 172
Re: OS X 10.4.4 cracked for PCs
« Reply #38 on: 2 March 2006, 23:00 »
Raising FSB won't get you back to 1T. You can't go past 333MHz clock, no matter how high your FSB is. I was referring to Gigabyte's use of cheap parts in their boards, temp sensors that break apart.

Lead Head

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,508
  • Kudos: 534
Re: OS X 10.4.4 cracked for PCs
« Reply #39 on: 2 March 2006, 23:18 »
[indent]Umm...The temp sensor is now integrated in the CPU. Dude. when i raise the FSB by OCing and dropping the multiplier, CPU stays at stock speeds and i get the ram back upto 400Mhz, simple is that
[/indent]
sig.

Xeniczone

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 76
  • Kudos: 0
Re: OS X 10.4.4 cracked for PCs
« Reply #40 on: 3 March 2006, 00:36 »
Quote
Somehow I find that these kinds of arguments escalate uncontrollably ... I mean no matter what you say, it just won't stop ... but why bother stopping it, just watch people duke it out ...

Your right god!!!
 
 
Quote
Ok i am done arguing with this moron.

I'm sure me and the moderators enjoy you calling others names. Mainly when you keep calling me names. I don't even have your computer. Your the one not making seens you have proven you have a 939 motherboard. then you clam you have a amd 3000+ cpu. Unless you have a 700 and a 900 board.


And you do know instead of taking your computer apart you could have just taking a screen with zcpu or somthing lol. :p :fu:



:macos: XenicZone:macos:

cymon

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 354
  • Kudos: 172
Re: OS X 10.4.4 cracked for PCs
« Reply #41 on: 3 March 2006, 02:00 »
But Xeniczone, you are a moron.

AMD does make the Athlon 3000+ in a 939 socket. If you don't know shit about PC hardware, please, STFU.

Lead's bus is 400MHz, sure, I believe him, but there's no getting around the 2T limit. Unless he's switched out the memory controller, you're accessing the RAM at 400 speeds, but that RAM will only run at 2T. That's why people avoid 256MB sticks. Just get some Corsair Value, it's only eighty dollars, and this thread is off topic enough.

mobrien_12

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,138
  • Kudos: 711
    • http://www.geocities.com/mobrien_12
Re: OS X 10.4.4 cracked for PCs
« Reply #42 on: 3 March 2006, 03:42 »
Quote from: Lead Head
Actually gigabyte mother baords are rock stable if you dont O/C.


I had 2 GigaByte Motherboards in 2 different computers.  They were both stable (as in didn't crash) and GB was very good about bios updates.

However, both boards failed after only a few years.  I decided that I wasn't going to deal with them again.
In brightest day, in darkest night, no evil shall escape my sight....

cymon

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 354
  • Kudos: 172
Re: OS X 10.4.4 cracked for PCs
« Reply #43 on: 3 March 2006, 03:44 »
This place is really much nicer with 'zone on ignore.

Lead Head

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,508
  • Kudos: 534
Re: OS X 10.4.4 cracked for PCs
« Reply #44 on: 3 March 2006, 03:57 »
Quote from: Xeniczone
Your right god!!!
 
 

 
I'm sure me and the moderators enjoy you calling others names. Mainly when you keep calling me names. I don't even have your computer. Your the one not making seens you have proven you have a 939 motherboard. then you clam you have a amd 3000+ cpu. Unless you have a 700 and a 900 board.


And you do know instead of taking your computer apart you could have just taking a screen with zcpu or somthing lol. :p :fu:



:macos: XenicZone:macos:

I am a moderator. and its CPu-z, but yes i agree, lets get back on topic now

Cymon, AMD discontinued the 3000 for socket 939 2-3 months ago
sig.