« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6   Go Down

Author Topic: Vista public BETA released  (Read 9199 times)

toadlife

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 730
  • Kudos: 376
    • http://toadlife.net
Re: Vista public BETA released
« Reply #30 on: 17 June 2006, 09:55 »
Quote from: Aloone_Jonez
But isn't that stupid?

Surly they should make it so it runs on hardware at least two years old? Personally I'd like them set the minimum requirements for a typical five year old machine.

I don't see any reason why it wouldn't run on a five year old computer. I just threw out an Athlon 750 machine that would have run Vista just fine. It was six years old.  The computers I tested on ran it with all of the fancy effects activated and it ran very fast - just as fast as XP. ON older machines you would have to turn down the graphical effects (it can revert all the way back to the "Windows Classic" look), but the security features, which I think are the best part of Vista would still be there.
Logged
:)

Aloone_Jonez

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,090
  • Kudos: 954
Re: Vista public BETA released
« Reply #31 on: 17 June 2006, 11:46 »
Don't believe you, my machine is less than five years old and it won't run Vista, unless you've upgraded your five year old machine which is of course cheating.
Logged
This is not a Windows help forum, however please do feel free to sign up and agree or disagree with our views on Microsoft.

Oh and FUCKMicrosoft! :fu:

H_TeXMeX_H

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,988
  • Kudos: 494
    • http://draconishinobi.50webs.com/
Re: Vista public BETA released
« Reply #32 on: 17 June 2006, 18:11 »
Quote from: toadlife
I don't see any reason why it wouldn't run on a five year old computer. I just threw out an Athlon 750 machine that would have run Vista just fine. It was six years old.  The computers I tested on ran it with all of the fancy effects activated and it ran very fast - just as fast as XP. ON older machines you would have to turn down the graphical effects (it can revert all the way back to the "Windows Classic" look), but the security features, which I think are the best part of Vista would still be there.

What are the specs on this "typical" 5 year old machine may I ask ?

Oh, and yes I have to agree XP is faster than an old granny in a tar pit.
Logged

piratePenguin

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,027
  • Kudos: 775
    • http://piratepenguin.is-a-geek.com/~declan/
Re: Vista public BETA released
« Reply #33 on: 17 June 2006, 22:59 »
Quote from: toadlife
but the security features, which I think are the best part of Vista would still be there.
Oh yes, the wonderful security features ;)
Logged
"What you share with the world is what it keeps of you."
 - Noah And The Whale: Give a little love



a poem by my computer, Macintosh Vigilante
Macintosh amends a damned around the requested typewriter. Macintosh urges a scarce design. Macintosh postulates an autobiography. Macintosh tolls the solo variant. Why does a winter audience delay macintosh? The maker tosses macintosh. Beneath female suffers a double scum. How will a rat cube the heavier cricket? Macintosh calls a method. Can macintosh nest opposite the headache? Macintosh ties the wrong fairy. When can macintosh stem the land gang? Female aborts underneath macintosh. Inside macintosh waffles female. Next to macintosh worries a well.

ReggieMicheals

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 186
  • Kudos: 228
    • http://osadvocacy.frih.net/
Re: Vista public BETA released
« Reply #34 on: 18 June 2006, 01:36 »
Quote from: H_TeXMeX_H
What are the specs on this "typical" 5 year old machine may I ask ?

Oh, and yes I have to agree XP is faster than an old granny in a tar pit.

Here's the "average" pre built PC specs of Dells in 2001:
866 Mhz P III CPU
SoundBlaster Live!
Nvidia Riva TNT2
200W Power Supply
128 MB PC-133 RAM
Logged
Operating System Advocacy. I've given up on the Microsuck project, as well as any of the minisite spinoffs. You can still view the new beta site, though!

Aloone_Jonez

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,090
  • Kudos: 954
Re: Vista public BETA released
« Reply #35 on: 18 June 2006, 04:09 »
And bullshit will Vista run on that, infact XP would struggle to run on a machine that slow which says something as it's the year it was released.
Logged
This is not a Windows help forum, however please do feel free to sign up and agree or disagree with our views on Microsoft.

Oh and FUCKMicrosoft! :fu:

H_TeXMeX_H

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,988
  • Kudos: 494
    • http://draconishinobi.50webs.com/
Re: Vista public BETA released
« Reply #36 on: 18 June 2006, 04:19 »
My point exactly ... I would really like to see toadlife actually support his arguments for M$ will a little more evidence and details ... and less bullshit ...
Logged

toadlife

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 730
  • Kudos: 376
    • http://toadlife.net
Re: Vista public BETA released
« Reply #37 on: 18 June 2006, 04:54 »
Quote from: Aloone_Jonez
Don't believe you, my machine is less than five years old and it won't run Vista, unless you've upgraded your five year old machine which is of course cheating.

A typical five year old PC would need a RAM upgrade to run Vista. 512MB of ram.
Logged
:)

Orethrius

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,783
  • Kudos: 982
Re: Vista public BETA released
« Reply #38 on: 18 June 2006, 05:48 »
Quote from: Toadlife
I don't see any reason why it wouldn't run on a five year old computer.


Quote from: Toadlife
A typical five year old PC would need a RAM upgrade to run Vista. 512MB of ram.


Okay, by that logic, I could put $5,000 worth of hardware into my 450 MHz P3's box and say that I'm running Vista Ultimate Edition flawlessly on an eight-year-old system.  I'm sorry, but I call bullshit.
Logged

Proudly posted from a Gentoo Linux system.

Quote from: Calum
even if you're renting you've got more rights than if you're using windows.

System Vitals

Kelsey23

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
  • Kudos: 10
Re: Vista public BETA released
« Reply #39 on: 18 June 2006, 06:23 »
Quote from: toadlife
A typical five year old PC would need a RAM upgrade to run Vista. 512MB of ram.

Let's say its a 1GHz PC with 512MB RAM. It'll run Vista ok, but something makes me think it's not gonna cooperate well with Aero
 
 
I for one don't plan on trading in XP for Vista. Infact, once they start to make everything want Vista, I plan on single-booting my x86 as Linux only :-D
 
:macos:  <3
Logged

inane

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 107
  • Kudos: 233
    • http://www.myblogspace.net/inaneframe
Re: Vista public BETA released
« Reply #40 on: 18 June 2006, 06:26 »
YOU'RE ALL THE FUCKING SAME!!! GET OFF MY FUCKING PORCH!!!

W1NDOWS 5UX0RS!!!!!...

Fuck I'm on Windows right now... only because I bought Macromedia Flash Pro 8. FUCK THE SOFTWARE INDUSTRY! I need an outlet for my creative energy...

Yeah yeah yeah Vista blah blah blah
Logged

toadlife

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 730
  • Kudos: 376
    • http://toadlife.net
Re: Vista public BETA released
« Reply #41 on: 18 June 2006, 06:58 »
Quote from: Orethrius
Okay, by that logic, I could put $5,000 worth of hardware into my 450 MHz P3's box and say that I'm running Vista Ultimate Edition flawlessly on an eight-year-old system.  I'm sorry, but I call bullshit.

First of all, I never said "ultimate edition". Ultimate edtion comes with all kinds of medi features, which you wouldn't want to even think about using on a five year old box, regardless of the OS.

Second of all, all that would be needed on that example Dell box posted earlier would be a RAM upgrade, which would cost around $60. Not $5000.

With a proper amount of RAM vista sans the aero eye-candy would run fine.
Logged
:)

toadlife

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 730
  • Kudos: 376
    • http://toadlife.net
Re: Vista public BETA released
« Reply #42 on: 18 June 2006, 07:00 »
Quote from: Kelsey23
Let's say its a 1GHz PC with 512MB RAM. It'll run Vista ok, but something makes me think it's not gonna cooperate well with Aero
 

Uhhh. Yeah. I didn't mention it because I though it would be obvious, but I guess the obvious isn't so obvious to folks around here. :nothappy:
Logged
:)

piratePenguin

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,027
  • Kudos: 775
    • http://piratepenguin.is-a-geek.com/~declan/
Re: Vista public BETA released
« Reply #43 on: 18 June 2006, 07:05 »
Well Aero must be one bloated piece of shit considering Xgl runs dreamy (by that I mean: no obvious performance difference) on my Athlon XP 2600+, 256 MB RAM, radeon 9600
Logged
"What you share with the world is what it keeps of you."
 - Noah And The Whale: Give a little love



a poem by my computer, Macintosh Vigilante
Macintosh amends a damned around the requested typewriter. Macintosh urges a scarce design. Macintosh postulates an autobiography. Macintosh tolls the solo variant. Why does a winter audience delay macintosh? The maker tosses macintosh. Beneath female suffers a double scum. How will a rat cube the heavier cricket? Macintosh calls a method. Can macintosh nest opposite the headache? Macintosh ties the wrong fairy. When can macintosh stem the land gang? Female aborts underneath macintosh. Inside macintosh waffles female. Next to macintosh worries a well.

inane

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 107
  • Kudos: 233
    • http://www.myblogspace.net/inaneframe
Re: Vista public BETA released
« Reply #44 on: 18 June 2006, 07:36 »
Quote from: toadlife
Uhhh. Yeah. I didn't mention it because I though it would be obvious, but I guess the obvious isn't so obvious to folks around here. :nothappy:

Yeah anybody who dislikes the actions of Microsoft must be a total idiot... :thumbup:
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6   Go Up
« previous next »