Operating Systems > macOS
Leopard Lives and Kicks Vista's Butt
piratePenguin:
And honestly, people complain about Microsoft not porting DirectX 10 to Windows XP. Microsoft have given (they had to) technical reasons for why that would be extremely difficult.
I doubt very much there would be anything too difficult about porting Core Animation to Tiger - what has changed that would affect it?? It could just be a simple recompile.
Unless there are technical reasons that it would be difficult to port Core Animation to Tiger, what Apple's doing is not less bad than what MS is doing with DX10. But Apple, like MS, have to do shit like this - they have to pay their programmers, and keep some money for their $1000 cigars.
(free software ftmfw)
WMD:
--- Quote ---In one, you gotta pay Apple $150 or whatever for OS X and possibly buy a new computer,
--- End quote ---
It's $129, and why would you need to buy a new computer?
piratePenguin:
--- Quote from: WMD ---It's $129, and why would you need to buy a new computer?
--- End quote ---
Because you need to have an Apple computer to run Mac OS X.
WMD:
The post you quoted was talking about OS X updates versus QT updates. If you're getting an update to OS X, I think you're updating an installed copy on an Apple computer you already have.
piratePenguin:
--- Quote from: WMD ---The post you quoted was talking about OS X updates versus QT updates. If you're getting an update to OS X, I think you're updating an installed copy on an Apple computer you already have.
--- End quote ---
Will there be a PPC version of 10.5? If not, then there you go. As if that matters, I'm sure you get the idea anyhow.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version