Author Topic: Real to offer Windows Media on Linux  (Read 5038 times)

Orethrius

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,783
  • Kudos: 982
Re: Real to offer Windows Media on Linux
« Reply #15 on: 19 August 2006, 18:35 »
Quote from: H_TeXMeX_H
With the "non-free" and probably also "illegal in the US" codecs and Mplayer or Xine you can play any wmv out there.

You realise that every major codec has some lib or another that's closed-source in some place or another?  At the very least, some jackass coder somewhere decided to obfuscate variables where it wasn't at all necessary.  Also, win32codecs illegal?  Where do people keep getting this crap?  Last I checked, the DeCSS case was dismissed as the primary usage was Fair Use private copying (as in, not for the use of others) which trumps DMCA (IIRC, there's even a provision for it in that law's text).

Quote from: H_TeXMeX_H
I very much prefer any other format than wmv, simply because it's horrible.

Actually, I prefer to keep away from WinMedia because it's a proprietary codec financed by a marketing giant that could only produce a *live* weasel if it searched its own PR department.

Quote from: H_TeXMeX_H
If you haven't seen the horrible quality, go find yourself the same movie encoded in wmv and any other format. The wmv will always lose.

Not necessarily.  More often than not, the poor quality is due to neophytes that think higher compression is always better - as it results in lower filesizes.  Few people concerned with the size of a WinMedia file consider the quality loss - AVI, MPG, and MOV degrade at lower bitstreams, too.  I've seen BRILLIANT game-ad pieces produced ENTIRELY in WinMedia, but the sad truth is that the majority of Windows users making videos can't be trusted to collate copies.

Proudly posted from a Gentoo Linux system.

Quote from: Calum
even if you're renting you've got more rights than if you're using windows.

System Vitals

Lord PsyPing

  • Guest
Re: Real to offer Windows Media on Linux
« Reply #16 on: 19 August 2006, 23:19 »
[Removed]
« Last Edit: 25 June 2011, 16:14 by Lord PsyPing »

worker201

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,810
  • Kudos: 703
    • http://www.triple-bypass.net
Re: Real to offer Windows Media on Linux
« Reply #17 on: 19 August 2006, 23:42 »
Quote from: Orethrius
Actually, I prefer to keep away from WinMedia because it's a proprietary codec financed by a marketing giant that could only produce a *live* weasel if it searched its own PR department.

ROFLMAO

weasels, indeed

pofnlice

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 999
  • Kudos: 650
Re: Real to offer Windows Media on Linux
« Reply #18 on: 19 August 2006, 23:49 »
I like real, it has it's own erotic section on the front page...

It doesn't take a lot to please me :D
Quote from: "Orethrius"
After all, running Windows without a decent anti-virus is like walking through a Red Light District after eating five metric tonnes of Viagra.

Orethrius

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,783
  • Kudos: 982
Re: Real to offer Windows Media on Linux
« Reply #19 on: 20 August 2006, 08:39 »
Quote from: Lord PsyPing
Indeed, that's what I was trying to say.

Next time I should think, than speak. :p

Damned, now I forgot to think, again.  :p


Like I said, I don't buy that.  These are the same people that would use FinalCut or Cinelerra if people took the time to steer them in that direction.  The end results of such apathy are the worthless WMVs we see floating around the Internet today, since Movie Maker actively encourages users to set higher compression on their files (hey, it saves space, but if you read the fine print - which we know you won't - it says that some degradation MAY occur - can't sue us NOW, can ya?) while ignoring the subsequent ramifications.  Seriously, if WinMedia vanished overnight, I doubt very many would lose any sleep over it - particularly not Avid, Adobe, and a host of others I'm sure I could name if I spent five minutes looking into it.  

Yet Microsoft feels it's their sole duty to perpetuate their format AND ONLY THEIR FORMAT for their tool, while encouraging users to make bad editing decisions.  Sounds like another setup to sue the PC vendors for "willful negligence" if you ask me (hey, we TOLD them not to use higher compression ratios, but YOUR fine-print reader made the type too small.  Give us money.)

Proudly posted from a Gentoo Linux system.

Quote from: Calum
even if you're renting you've got more rights than if you're using windows.

System Vitals

mobrien_12

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,138
  • Kudos: 711
    • http://www.geocities.com/mobrien_12
Re: Real to offer Windows Media on Linux
« Reply #20 on: 20 August 2006, 08:45 »
OK.  Why are the WMP codecs illegal?

They aren't hacked.  They are the original codecs.  They are not being sold as a part of windows.  They are downloadable separately.  Admittedly, I haven't looked at the licence agreement, but I don't see you violating jack squat.  

Like I said, I haven't looked into this really closely, but I don't see this as being any less legal than using Windows TrueType fonts on my Linux box (and that is 100% legal).

Furthermore, most of us have a legit copy of windows with those same bloody codecs on it.  So what's the problem?

I'm not calling anyone a liar here.  If someone knows something for sure, please specify.  Otherwise, I see no reason to assume illegality.


By the way, WMV and WMA sucks!  I wish they would DIE.  

Most of the stuff from the OGG project blows MS crap away.  OGG FLAC, OGG Vorbis, Ogg theora, is awesome from technical, usability, and freedom standpoints.  Windoids go with the default (which MS knows and relies on).
In brightest day, in darkest night, no evil shall escape my sight....

H_TeXMeX_H

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,988
  • Kudos: 494
    • http://draconishinobi.50webs.com/
Re: Real to offer Windows Media on Linux
« Reply #21 on: 20 August 2006, 19:02 »
I don't think they are illegal in and of themselves. But, I believe they may be illegal to redistribute without permission.

hm_murdock

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,629
  • Kudos: 378
  • The Lord of Thyme
Re: Real to offer Windows Media on Linux
« Reply #22 on: 21 August 2006, 05:59 »
They should be illegal due to high amounts of suck found in them, as well as multiple counts of douchebaggery.
Go the fuck ~

worker201

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,810
  • Kudos: 703
    • http://www.triple-bypass.net
Re: Real to offer Windows Media on Linux
« Reply #23 on: 21 August 2006, 07:08 »
In the computer industry, suck and douchebaggery actually increase the cost of the product.  Panels of experts have not yet been able to ascertain the reasons why this is so, but are expected to release a verdict sometime in 2019.

hm_murdock

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,629
  • Kudos: 378
  • The Lord of Thyme
Re: Real to offer Windows Media on Linux
« Reply #24 on: 21 August 2006, 08:49 »
I forgot about that. I await their findings!!
Go the fuck ~

Jack2000

  • Guest
Re: Real to offer Windows Media on Linux
« Reply #25 on: 3 September 2006, 21:06 »
Windows formats suck big time !
hell you all people :
"oh this is the new new new new player that will even brush your teeth!"
grrrr...
to be loathed:Real Player,Music Mach Juke Box(or something),WMPlayer,Quick time

Orethrius

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,783
  • Kudos: 982
Re: Real to offer Windows Media on Linux
« Reply #26 on: 4 September 2006, 00:29 »
Um, Quicktime is Apple, not Windows.  Sorry bud.  :D

Proudly posted from a Gentoo Linux system.

Quote from: Calum
even if you're renting you've got more rights than if you're using windows.

System Vitals

worker201

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,810
  • Kudos: 703
    • http://www.triple-bypass.net
Re: Real to offer Windows Media on Linux
« Reply #27 on: 4 September 2006, 02:21 »
But we can still loathe Quicktime, right?

H_TeXMeX_H

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,988
  • Kudos: 494
    • http://draconishinobi.50webs.com/
Re: Real to offer Windows Media on Linux
« Reply #28 on: 4 September 2006, 04:34 »
The Window$ version of quicktime is kinda bloated and shitty ... dunno about the Mac version.

WMD

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,525
  • Kudos: 391
    • http://www.dognoodle99.cjb.net
Re: Real to offer Windows Media on Linux
« Reply #29 on: 4 September 2006, 04:40 »
QuickTime for Mac is ok.  At least now they are trying to push open formats (like H.264) instead of yet another version of Sorenson video.
My BSOD gallery
"Yes there's nothing wrong with going around being rude and selfish, killing people and fucking married women, but being childish is a cardinal sin around these parts." -Aloone_Jonez