Go windows go!

[www.unixsucks.com]

Go Windows go (i can never get it too)

[ August 26, 2002: Message edited by: Ex Eleven / b0b ]

[lazygamer]

Why does an OS always have to suck? What about being "windowsisnotasbadasyouthink.com"? That tends to give you more journalistic integrity with the people here.

Or what about "unixhasitsownissues.com" or "unixhasdownsidestoo.com".

Sucks just makes someone appear heavily biased, of course this place is called Fuckmicrosoft so that's hypocritical.  

[www.unixsucks.com]

I'm not a journalist so it does not make any difference to me what site name means.
I actully have more tolerant view of UNIX compared to what UNIX-lovers have of Windows. I did not want to use "f*" as it's really UNIX way of treating people (M$, Microsucks, Internet Exploder, ...), just acting like a bunch of pissed off teenagers, not much support for accusations but a lot of fuss.

BTW, I really like design of this forum, whoever did it - did a good job.

UNIX still sucks

[lazygamer]

quote:
The common problem with so called BSD (Blue Screen Of Death) in 90% of the cases called by hardware not being on HCL (Hardware Compatibility List) or drivers not signed by Microsoft or poorely written third party programs.

Ok in the interest of both parties, can Linux say that it has much lower BSD risk when using the same drivers? If so, then it proves that Microsoft software is less compatibile in general.(doesn't prove that it's a poorly written piece of shit as that's semi-opinon, but everyone can admit that would prove "less compatibility")

 

quote:So about stability and quality of applications running on Windows. As I specialise in web servers I would compare IIS and Apache. IIS is as stable and Apache, things which might make it unstable are usually caused (as everything else on webservers) by poorely written applications. If you would host plain ASP pages and static content I would guarantee that IIS would run as long as any Apache. Sometimes "Worshipper" would try to point out that longest uptime belongs to Apache, but if you would look behind the scene and check what site he is usually talking about then you would see that it's a site consisting of SINGLE STATIC page likehttp://wwwprod1.telia.com/. Give me colocation space, Windows2000 and I'll guarantee you the same uptime on the same kind of server.

So who gives a fux0r about servers. Servers this servers that. HOW DOES YOUR OS FARE UNDER CONSTANTLY MULTI-TASKING, OPENING AND CLOSING A TON OF DIFFERENT PROGRAMS, OR PLAYING A HIGHLY RESOURCE INTENSIVE GAME? Using "server uptime" for OS reliability is like measuring 3D game performance(ie:timedemo etc.) without using a specfically tortortous route of testing in the game.

 

quote:The story is not actually about technical stuff (though it's a reason for comparison) but the way UNIX worshippers treats anything which comes from Microsoft.

Yes that's true. It's because the reasons Unix d00dz have for hating Microsoft could be classified as "conspriacy theories" because it's not very common knowledge to the average person. So windows d00dz think Unix d00dz are full of propaganda because what they say seems to "not be fact". A conspiracy is either fact or fiction, but it's hard to tell what one is correct sometimes. To one side it's always fact, to others it's always fiction.

[lazygamer]

Unix sux... hey did you make that site yourself?

[Master of Reality]

it never ceases to amaze me how all these windows fanatics cant seem to only post once.
DONT FUCKING DOUBLE POST AGAIN.
a mod should close this (i believe this belongs to the Linux forum, and he already posted this topic in the linux forum)
http://forum.fuckmicrosoft.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=5&t=000639

[www.unixsucks.com]

quote:Originally posted by lazygamer:


To one side it's always fact, to others it's always fiction.

No, there are facts which do not depend on anybody's opinion like no of transactions per second for SQL servers or no of hits per second for web servers and both of this is not in favour of UNIX by the way.

[AlexMax]

Ten bucks says that this is XP Loser.

[LorKorub]

quote: You pretty easy can spot such individual by examining their vocabularily, it's childish but I guess it shows their level of desperation. Common names include M$, Internet Exploder, Windoze, Microsucks etc.  

And it is pretty easy to spot Windoid idiots like yourself by examining their grammar.

By the way:  www.yourwebpagesucks.com

[www.unixsucks.com]

I got used to the crap like that (calling names etc) so I'll merely disregards all postings of this nature.
Yes, I use Windows XP, I also use Windows 2000 is it something wrong about it? Is it insecure? Here is it - www.unixsucks.com, please prove yourself, hack into it. I'll even tell you the whole site structure. So DSL connection goes into my house through computer named Router (Windows 2000), running ISA server (Microsoft firewall), your connection getting reverse proxied to server called Eltzin which is also Exchange 2000 server, domain controller and web server. unixsucks.com using .NET framework for server side. I have also 2 more computers on home network running Windows XP. Home network using private 10.0.1.0 address space. Do you need IPs on internal machines?
So again, instead of stressing air with your anti-Microsoft slogans, please prove yourself and hack into my home network. If you would fail then please "go and fuck yourself" as you suggested before.

[saddlemagic]

What you know? You can tell by the grammer.

Hey Sucks guy, the next time you computer is insecure just pat it on the head and reassure it that everything will be ok.

[voidmain]

Well being equally proficient in UNIX, Linux, and all Windows operating systems I can say beyond the shadow of a doubt that Windows completely blows compared to any flavor of UNIX or Linux.  And I have been a heavy user/admin of M$ operating systems since version 2.x of DOS.

And by the way, you can turn off the Apache header stuff so you can not see what modules are running or what version of Apache is being used with a single line in the configuration file.  Have you seen anything even close to "Code Red" or any of the other numerous exploits/viruses in Apache?  Didn't think so...

[ August 20, 2002: Message edited by: VoidMain ]

[Doctor V]

quote:Originally posted by www.unixsucks.com:
I did not want to use "f*" as it's really UNIX way of treating people (M$, Microsucks, Internet Exploder, ...), just acting like a bunch of pissed off teenagers, not much support for accusations but a lot of fuss.

Not much support for the accusations?  Really?  Well then you obviously havn't read very many of the posts on this site.  This site is FULL of support for the accusations.  You are also hipocritical.  You claim to be clean and not childish by not using obscene language or acting like a pissed off teenager, but what about that image on your site?  If you don't like *nix, fine.  Just shut your damn mouth and use your windows, if your happy with that, I could care less.  You can shell out loads of money to BillyG's empire, and use his proven inferior proprietary products all you want for all I care.  You are a sheep-slave blindly following M$.  Please leave and never come back.

[ravuya]

Did you cross-post this shit? If it even touches my forum, it's going right to Dead Thread or Ban This Asshole status.

[Master of Reality]

quote:Originally posted by AlexMax:
Ten bucks says that this is XP Loser.

no it isnt... he seems smarter than XP Luser, and he has a different ISP.