Operating Systems > Linux and UNIX
Certified to suck.
Kintaro:
--- Quote from: Orethrius on 25 August 2008, 08:42 ---
--- Quote from: Kintaro on 25 August 2008, 08:36 ---I mentioned MS OOXML because someone mentioned document formats, that's all dude.
--- End quote ---
If I believed for two seconds that your wiring let you push OOXML after getting your ass busted for trying to weasel out some twisted confession regarding RTF support, I would've said so. You mentioned OOXML because it turns out that you know precisely dick about RTF legacy support in Linux.
--- End quote ---
RTF thing was unrelated, save to TXT, save to this and that, or hell: Save to Office 97/2000/2003 format, that is supported by AbiWord and OpenOffice Writer. I'm just saying: document compatibility already exists.
You are right, I know little about the complexities, but I know I can get a document I made on Office to load in OpenOffice so I just don't see the huge barrier here.
Calum:
the barrier is closed formats and broken standards, like it always is with MS.
A document created in MS Office is not always going to work in OpenOffice.org, Microsoft even change the file format between versions of the software, as an incentive for MS Office users to "up"grade, but also to deter projects that would like to read and write to Microsoft Office file formats. Even if it does open, it may well not look anything like it did in MS Office, and that does put people off. Sometimes the difference is irritating enough to really get on your nerves.
This is because MS, the owner of the de facto standard in office software file formats, have decided to manage their formats in this way. closed spec to force everybody else to guess how they work and change the spec every couple of years just for a laugh. Instead they should use proper open standards and everybody'd be happier.
By comparison it would be like if a small country already had a functioning government and economy and then a large country like the US imposed sanctions or sent troops in to "sort everything out" basically so they can keep control (of the global economy in the case of the countries, or of the market in the case of the software company). When you look at it, it's just selfish and nobody benefits except the large country, or in the case of MS the large company, same thing in a lot of ways.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version