so this is platform independent? or just ms windows?
also, what wanker at adobe thinks it's acceptable to state that simply not disclosing the details of a potentially exploitable piece of software somehow makes it more secure to use?
the very fact that it is known that there is a vulnerability is bad enough i would say. "more time" is never something a serious software maintainer (certainly one charging money for usage licences!) should have the luxury of when it comes to security vulnerabilities needing patched.