All Things Microsoft > Microsoft Software

What name should the next windows version have?

<< < (8/16) > >>

Refalm:
That would be an incorrect follow-up, as Windows 3.2 already exists:

http://toastytech.com/guis/win32.html

worker201:
oops, make that 3.3?
3.x?

Maybe Windows OSX, to confuse the masses.

OldManRiver:
Can I join the fun.

How about:

Micro KL

For Micro Kernal, now that XP is running on a Red Hat shell.  If they really do Micro their Kernal it will be a blessing.

And the note about Window 11 for bankruptcy, may not be too far off, now that MS has shown they can't write software and have to pirate even Linux.

restin256:
They took the stable bits from liscensed Unix memory handling code, since we all know it's impossible for Microsoft programmers to think of a  stable OS.

Pyrotechnician_2004:

quote:Originally posted by OldManRiver:
Can I join the fun.

How about:

Micro KL

For Micro Kernal, now that XP is running on a Red Hat shell.  If they really do Micro their Kernal it will be a blessing.

And the note about Window 11 for bankruptcy, may not be too far off, now that MS has shown they can't write software and have to pirate even Linux.
--- End quote ---



What the FUCK are you talking about, Windows XP running on the Red Hat Shell, fuck off, you obviously aren't a Linux user and deserve to be shot.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page