Miscellaneous > Programming & Networking

w3C Standards Not Met

(1/3) > >>

yourlife:
Should I care in the slightest that my XHTML 1.0 Transitonal page does not meet w3's standards?
I'm probably going to fix it anyway, because I can, just I want to know whether I'm just wasting my time
(Sorry if this is in the wrong board, I just didn't have a clue where else to place it)

Refalm:
Well, I guess it's sort of in the right forum.

I try to uphold the W3C standards when I'm beginning to develop a website. That way, you're sure it looks the same on most browsers.
However, if I want a feature like a fancy jQuery script, or
--- Code: ---<a href="http://www.example.org/"><div class="button">Example</div></a>
--- End code ---
, I just implement it. Even if the almighty W3C doesn't approve of it.

yourlife:
Haha, ok, I'll give it a go (why the f does w3 hate <table backgroud="images/bg.jpg">? They want me to do it in CSS!, ah well, I don't care

worker201:
Yeah, fuck it, standards are useless.  Why don't you just use Microsoft Word to make your webpage, it's much easier.

Lead Head:
Oh yes, Word's export to HTML function is quite possibly the greatest thing ever!

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page