Author Topic: win9x/NT  (Read 1404 times)

k3it4r0u

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 29
  • Kudos: 0
    • http://wired.homeunix.org/
win9x/NT
« on: 30 November 2001, 06:53 »
Rate the OSes you've used in each family based on experience.

5 = Poor
4 = Crappy
3 = Shitty [A bit more crappier than crappy]
2 = What the fuck were they smoking?
1 = What happened to my stores of drainO?
-inf = Typical...  :D
--

Win9x:
Win 95 v2 = 1
Win 98 FE = 1 // Win95 v2 + crash_every(4s)
Win 98 SE = 1.00001 // Win95 v2 + crash_every(8s)
  :rolleyes:
Win ME = -inf   :mad:

WinNT:
Win NT 3.51 - 2
Win NT 4 - 1
Win 2000 = -inf [Clicking on Disk Cleanup for NTFS partitions is like suicide   :D]

Now you do this, and in a fair manner too.  :D

[ November 29, 2001: Message edited by: k3it4r0u ]
(c) 2000 The Microsoft C++ Class
It's grammar, not grammer.

ssjhook

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 23
  • Kudos: 0
    • http://www.dsyunktional.cjb.net
win9x/NT
« Reply #1 on: 30 November 2001, 07:23 »
win 95 = 1
win 98 = 2
win me = 1
win 2000= 3
+->hook

actualfact

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 49
  • Kudos: 0
win9x/NT
« Reply #2 on: 30 November 2001, 08:26 »
hahaa nice.


95 = 2 . . this gets a 2 just cause it was a good step up from 3.1.
w98 = .5 . . 98's a bitch.  become obsolete.
win me = .6 . . it's better than 98, i guess.
win nt = -inf . . i hate you
win 2k = 3.5 . . it's not unix, but it's than the others.
win xp = -inf . . die!

k3it4r0u

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 29
  • Kudos: 0
    • http://wired.homeunix.org/
win9x/NT
« Reply #3 on: 30 November 2001, 08:30 »
WinME fucked up my partitions, so I had to format & fdisk it AGAIN, then I installed 2000 and recopied all the backup data off 50 something CD-RWs.

Win2000 is a memory hog. I'm probably going to fuck windows and put RedHat 7.1 on the system + KDE for the language packs.

[ November 29, 2001: Message edited by: k3it4r0u ]
(c) 2000 The Microsoft C++ Class
It's grammar, not grammer.

actualfact

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 49
  • Kudos: 0
win9x/NT
« Reply #4 on: 30 November 2001, 08:37 »
shit, some apps are ruthless..exchange will take up to 3gb of memory, if you let it.

Sinewave

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
  • Kudos: 0
win9x/NT
« Reply #5 on: 1 December 2001, 02:42 »
Win2k isn't a bad OS. Not nearly as bad as the Win9X line. Roomy has it installed.. I use it now and then.

To bad they had to fuck it up when they released XP.

k3it4r0u

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 29
  • Kudos: 0
    • http://wired.homeunix.org/
win9x/NT
« Reply #6 on: 1 December 2001, 07:31 »
Well, opening My Computer, just that, takes about 45 seconds [Win2000 Professional Final].  
(c) 2000 The Microsoft C++ Class
It's grammar, not grammer.

FOOZKEEPER

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 10
  • Kudos: 0
win9x/NT
« Reply #7 on: 1 December 2001, 21:57 »
win95: 1
win98: -inf

Anti Ms

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
  • Kudos: 0
    • http://www.fuckmcdonalds.co.uk
win9x/NT
« Reply #8 on: 1 December 2001, 17:42 »
MS DOS = 2 (no evil graphics)
Win 3.1 = 3 (better then dos even though it was dos)
Win 3.11 = -inf (what the f were they thinking?)
win 95 = 1 (haahh)
win 98 = 2 (hmm better but still cr*p)
win NT5(win2000)  = - inf (crashed all the time
KILL THE PAPERCLIP.
PROUD USER OF ZEUS SERVER AND RED HAT

bcortens

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 37
  • Kudos: 0
win9x/NT
« Reply #9 on: 2 December 2001, 08:17 »
win 3.1         -- pathetic
win 95          -- worse than hell
win 98          -- well u get the idea by now
win nt           --  to crash now or to crash later (in 1 min)
win 2k          -- many many hacks for another blunder from microspunge
win xp          -- i'm surprised fisher price hasent sued em yet  :confused:
The wave of the future is within the holo field distorted world of Apple HQ

badkarma

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 497
  • Kudos: 0
win9x/NT
« Reply #10 on: 3 December 2001, 18:56 »
DOS - 2
WIN 3.1/3.11 - 2
WIN95 - 1
WIN98 FE/SE - -inf (what do you mean I have to take out 512mb out of my pc because you can't cope with 512mb+ ram?)
WIN ME - -inf (let's take win98, let it crash more and let the boys ovr at marketing slap some name on it)
WIN XP - -inf (NO I'M NOT A MORON WHO KNOWS SH*T ABOUT COMPUTERS THANK YOU VERY MUCH, NOW F*CK OFF WITH YOUR WIZARD)
If you can't learn to do something well, learn to enjoy doing it poorly.

Zeldario

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
  • Kudos: 0
win9x/NT
« Reply #11 on: 4 December 2001, 00:54 »
They all suck (1), except for Win98 it gets a 2 because it has the highest compatibility.
I'm now using Windows .NET Server which also sucks.

Orion

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Kudos: 0
win9x/NT
« Reply #12 on: 4 December 2001, 06:33 »
DOS = 2
3.1 = 3
3.11= 3.5
95  = 1
98  = -inf^3
nt4 = 1
nt5 = 3
xp  = -(inf)^(inf)
me  = -inf^5

reasoning issued upon request

gump420

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 168
  • Kudos: 0
win9x/NT
« Reply #13 on: 4 December 2001, 14:37 »
DOS 6 -- 4
Win 3 -- 3
WinNT -- 2
Win9x -- 1
WinXP -- -inf

Or something like that . . .  :cool:
I can't get over you until you get out from under him.

<fuck the name>

  • Guest
win9x/NT
« Reply #14 on: 4 December 2001, 22:48 »
Commodore 64 - 3
Dos - 2
Win 3.11 - -inf
Win95 - 2
Win98 - 1
WinMe - -inf
WinXP -inf^inf(inf/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0)
Dragonlinux - 4
Slackware - 3
BeOS - 2.1