Whats the best OS of microsuck?

[Refalm]

quote:bigmicrosoftlittleothers: intel,amd,compaq,ibm,gateway,dell,falcon,ibuypoweremachines,nvidia,ati,toshiba,sony(makers of the playstaion 1&2),yahoo,google,THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and every other country, state, city, county,province,company,person,and yourselves because they and billions more support microsoft software.

Intel: made their processor have support for Linux because many servers run it. Their Intel Xeon processor is known to run best on Linux.

AMD: Has worked with Linux development to make their processors compatible with Linux and vice versa. They want to compete with Intel in stable 64-bit Linux servers.

Compaq: Is now HP. HP has equipped their latest desktop PC's with Mandrake Linux.

IBM: Is known for advertising their Linux servers, which is their main focus.

Gateway: I agree, they're Microsoft's bitch. They copy design from Apple, and do it poorly too.

Dell: Install's FreeDOS instead of Windows at default, because they want to keep the price low.

nVidia: Has very good Linux and FreeBSD drivers for GeForce and nForce.

Ati: Their drivers for Linux are shit, but so are their Windows drivers.

Sony: Turned againts Microsoft when they released the Xbox.

Yahoo!: Is using FreeBSD to drive their websites.

Google: See this. Google has also stated that they are much better than MSN Search.

More countries and city's in Europe are starting to install Linux. Computer-makers in Asia are putting Linux on their PC's, because Microsoft's foreign ones are crappy and undertranslated.

[ July 11, 2003: Message edited by: Refalm ]

[Canadian Lover]

why is this in the windows forum? is it because yyou use windows?

[Calum]

quote:Originally posted by jens:
Well I know, they all suck but if you had to pick one wich one should you take???

microsoft bob.

[jasonlane]

quote:Originally posted by Refalm:


Intel: made their processor have support for Linux because many servers run it. Their Intel Xeon processor is known to run best on Linux.......................................................................................................................
More countries and city's in Europe are starting to install Linux. Computer-makers in Asia are putting Linux on their PC's, because Microsoft's foreign ones are crappy and undertranslated.

[ July 11, 2003: Message edited by: Refalm ]

absolutely

[slvadcjelli42]

I did some reading on that "Bob" thing... man, that's freaky stuff! And they expected you to pay $100 to use that crap? Now wonder it flopped. Besides, the name is too simple; instead of sounding user-friendly, it sounds creepy (Come on, everyone, don't you want BOB installed on your  computer? BOB will make everything just fine... yesss... BOB...)

[xyle_one]

The Best M$ OS I Own Duderz!!

[jasonlane]

That's twice you've shown that man! perhaps more....

Tell you what though, thats art    (understand I'm talentless though)

[xyle_one]

quote:Originally posted by Zardoz:
That's twice you've shown that man! perhaps more....

Tell you what though, thats art       (understand I'm talentless though)

well. if i had ore windows cds, i would show some new ones... huhm. maybe its time to make a new image  

[mushrooomprince]

I think after a thread has been around for a few weeks it needs to be trashed.

[snowdog]

I'm a month late to the party, but who gives a damn. If I had to choose, I'd have to pick DOS 6.22 with WFW 3.11. Nothing else. My wife is running W2K and it blows. Not much better than the Win 9x/ME crap. Don't get me started on WinXP! She's been running W2K for a couple years now. It blows. Overly complicated, butt-ugly, and buggy. With Linux, on our server, I edit 5 files (1 of which is on the client -- /etc/fstab) and I have Samba and NFS working (Samba for the wife's crap W2K partition). And everything automounts. Wonderfully simple. I got the wife dual booting with Linux (she prefers SuSE, I prefer Mandrake, go figure). So, on second thought, pi$$ on it, I don't want anything M$. Gimme an abacus.