All Things Microsoft > Microsoft Software
Whats the best OS of microsuck?
Jens14:
Well I know, they all suck but if you had to pick one wich one should you take???
Refalm:
GNU/Linux. Uh, maybe YellowTAB Zeta, because it might be going to kick ass. I also heard Mac OS X is good.
[EDIT]Oh wait, you meant "Which piece of shit that Microsoft brought out, would you choose if your family where held hostage until you install a Microsoft operating system on your computer?"
Well, I'd say Windows 98 SE. It's good for games, but that's it. Windows 95 OSR2 makes a half decent OS if you remove Internet Explorer.[/EDIT]
[ June 23, 2003: Message edited by: Refalm ]
Doctor V:
Well, all winblows OSes from the 98 line are very unstable and prone to crashing. So count out 3.1, 95, 98, and Me. NT is a step up from them, as it is much more stable. And 2000 is a bit stronger than NT. XP takes a step back from Win2K in the stability department, and it goes further by includeing many features that are actually to the detriment of the customer, such as product activation. XP does not crash alot, but if you let it run for long, performance takes a hit. So Win2K, a 3 year old OS, is the winner. And from the looks of it, Longhorn is going to be even worse, its going to set aside a part of your computer that only runs if it is authorized to by other people, thats right, not you, other people, such as Entertainment companys and only if you pay them for it. Of course, in the 3 year Microshit spent developing an inferior OS, Linux and Mac have both come to surpass Windows in quality by a LONG SHOT!
V
Laukev7:
Microsoft BOB RULEZ!!! :D :D :D
Just kidding!
I guess it would have to be Microsoft Xenix, then. ;)
Kupotek:
You must be confused.. Microsoft never made an OS did they? I thought they just stole OS's.. oh well...
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version