All Things Microsoft > Microsoft Software
5 Myths About 'Wronghorn'
anphanax:
XP isn't slow on old computers?
It takes like 3 seconds for sub-menus to open on the start menu, even with all graphical enhancements disabled on an older computer built for 98 that I was on.
Stryker:
quote:Originally posted by anphanax:
XP isn't slow on old computers?
It takes like 3 seconds for sub-menus to open on the start menu, even with all graphical enhancements disabled on an older computer built for 98 that I was on.
--- End quote ---
heh
it takes 3 seconds for my computer which was designed for windows xp with all the graphical enhancements disabled.
HPC GUY:
haha good luck running xp on a p1 233 mhz unless you got at least like 256 ram. just change the shell to progman and then maybe......
Refalm:
quote:anphanax: XP isn't slow on old computers?
It takes like 3 seconds for sub-menus to open on the start menu, even with all graphical enhancements disabled on an older computer built for 98 that I was on.
--- End quote ---
I've run it on a P1 200 MHz, 96 MB RAM, 16 MB SVGA just fine.
quote:HPC GUY: haha good luck running xp on a p1 233 mhz unless you got at least like 256 ram. just change the shell to progman and then maybe......
--- End quote ---
Wrong. At least 96 MB RAM. Really, I tested it.
Computer 1: 200 MHz, 96 MB RAM: Just fine
Computer 2: 450 MHz, 64 MB RAM: Slow as fucking hell
WMD:
quote:Originally posted by Refalm:
Computer 1: 200 MHz, 96 MB RAM: Just fine
Computer 2: 450 MHz, 64 MB RAM: Slow as fucking hell
--- End quote ---
I'd like to add to this list..
500Mhz, 256MB RAM: Fast, but only in Windows Classic mode. Slow after that. :eek:
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version