All Things Microsoft > Microsoft as a Company
Microsoft: Linux on desktops a threat
hm_murdock:
just a thought. I'm not knocking Linux at all, but I think something that would really help it on the desktop is if someone were to develop a user friendly UI layer the way Apple did over Darwin.
Instead of using X11, use a built-from-scratch, modern graphics framework (display Ghostscript? an open source Quartz?), develop a Linux-based OS that's as full-featured as Mac OS X, using KDE or Gnome as the UI foundations.
For it to be accepted on the desktop, much of what makes it UNIX will have to be hidden to the user. They don't know, don't want to know, and just don't care about anything in /etc, or /dev. they just want things to work. The concept of "mounting" drives will have to be an automatic process. You put the disk in, and it's mounted for you.
They're making huge strides in usability, but unfortunately, not enough. Remember, that for it to make it on the desktop, it can't be "good enough" or "as good"... it has to be BETTER than Windows. Better in every respect, not just licensing and stability. Usability has to be ahead. The Linux world will have to break down and accept processor-wasting eye-candy, because users are accustomed to it now. It's what they want!
Make a GNU implementation of the Apple/NeXT packages so that a program and all its support files are contained in their own tree, and represented by one icon. Users can't be bothered with worrying about library dependencies and what folder a file went to. It should all be contained in one icon. This is easier than Windows. Drag one icon to install the thing. No extra files, no registry, no endless installers. Just boom!
I have no doubts Linux will kick MS's ass on the desktop... but they've gotta do more than just make it look like Windows!
xyle_one:
i second that jimmyJames.
DC:
quote:Originally posted by void main:
There's only one word that popped into my mind upon reading that quote:
DUH!
What a stupid quote. I mean that's like saying "I am afraid if I put a few ice cubes into this full glass of water some of the water is going to spill out."
--- End quote ---
Even more stupid. Something like "hey, if someone takes some of my marbles, I might loose some!".
JJ, for your plan to work you must either make the enviroment X-compatible (with all problems that come with it) or develop a port for pretty much all package. Both will be huge undertakings, not mentioning the development itself.
Besides, X11 needs to be improved and expanded (it's modular. I love modules. expanding the specs is so easy). X is in itself not a bad design, it's just that the implementation isn't quite perfect. But the server-client thing is essentially a good thing. It's great that I can run some program from home (= faster computer) and display the stuff on the computer @ school (actual physical location).
mobrien_12:
quote:Originally posted by Jimmy James: Mac Commando:
.
Instead of using X11, use a built-from-scratch, modern graphics framework (display Ghostscript? an open source Quartz?),
--- End quote ---
XFree86 already supports display postscript.
emh:
quote:Originally posted by Jimmy James: Mac Commando:
The concept of "mounting" drives will have to be an automatic process. You put the disk in, and it's mounted for you.
--- End quote ---
This is exactly how drives are mounted in Mandrake Linux now.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version