All Things Microsoft > Microsoft Software
Windoze is not so baaad
jtpenrod:
quote:
Hi everybody, Actualy I am using windoze2k, and its IMO good operating system.
--- End quote ---
I suppose it's better than a poke in the eye with a sharp stick. ;)
_________________________________
Live Free or Die: Linux
If software can be free, why can't dolphins?
restin256:
quote:Originally posted by insomnia:
No sane hacker would ever think about cloning crap like DOS.
--- End quote ---
Actually, DOS was made by a hacker in the 80's, it was just stolen by Bill Gates and called MS DOS. Then it developed into Windoze.
DukePuke:
Listen you xeen, or whatever. Be lucky that you dont said "idiot" straightly to my face, cuz you'd be feel my boot-kick in your teeth , ok? I dont let that fat-ass linux cunt taunt at me without serious reason.You can laugh at my words in forum, but you will not show any braveness because any glassy fatfuck feels safe in his house behind display. Ok, I dont know correct meaning of "technical support" and "limited usage software" man, this is not sign of idiocy.
Talking about BSOD and crashes , and associate it for windoze its not accurate in these days. Windoze XP/2000 is fuckin stable, better take care of your own lnx crashes, they also occur sometimes.
What about my thread start? Yeah that I wanted say, that you guys sometimes blame M$, because you want to blame something. Reason , maybe social/psichological problems, poor childrenhood I dunno, but windoze 2000 is *good* OS, I bet you all know themselves.
Refalm:
quote:DukePuke: Listen you xeen, or whatever. Be lucky that you dont said "idiot" straightly to my face, cuz you'd be feel my boot-kick in your teeth , ok? I dont let that fat-ass linux cunt taunt at me without serious reason.You can laugh at my words in forum, but you will not show any braveness because any glassy fatfuck feels safe in his house behind display. Ok, I dont know correct meaning of "technical support" and "limited usage software" man, this is not sign of idiocy.
Talking about BSOD and crashes , and associate it for windoze its not accurate in these days. Windoze XP/2000 is fuckin stable, better take care of your own lnx crashes, they also occur sometimes.
What about my thread start? Yeah that I wanted say, that you guys sometimes blame M$, because you want to blame something. Reason , maybe social/psichological problems, poor childrenhood I dunno, but windoze 2000 is *good* OS, I bet you all know themselves.
--- End quote ---
Windows 2000 isn't good enough if you're serious about hosting a webserver or using it as a fileserver.
It might not look that way, but compared to Linux and UNIX, Windows 2000 is awfully slow on the server front.
And can you seriously claim that Windows XP is the best operating system for the desktop?
Really, install Windows XP and leave it on a broadband connection. It'll be hacked in at least a month, even with all the updates installed.
When I first heard about Longhorn, I thought Windows might be slightly better.
What a disappointment. It's just Windows XP with a theme and a lot of bloatware and a stupid 3 GHz minimum requirement (this may change however).
DukePuke:
Well, that makes me consider some.. Can you explain "Windoze2k is awfully slow in server front"? Actualy I believe something about it, because Linux and BSD dominates in server's sphere.
And XP, hmm.. I think this OS is reasonably safe with those patches, the guys from Redmond reacts well as new holes are discovered.
[ March 16, 2004: Message edited by: DukePuke ]
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version