All Things Microsoft > Microsoft Software
Windoze is not so baaad
Doogee:
Why don't you use Linux?
restin256:
quote:Originally posted by insomnia:
I meant using it for a full OS (their is a free DOS clone).
--- End quote ---
Yes, but if OpenDOS were more popular, people would make Window Managers like Fluxbox, Window Maker, or FVWM ported. Then, since it would already use the windows C:\, D:\, etc drive letter calling, all you'd need to do is intergrate Windows and DirectX API's. Then, you'd have yourself a Windows Replacement. The best part is that since it's open source, it's stable, less bloated, and unlike Windoze NT, it's fully DOS compatable.
solarismka:
quote:Originally posted by d00g33 :: doogee.is.dreaming.org:
Why don't you use Linux?
--- End quote ---
I know that i'm using it as a desktop. I never like the NT line of M$ products!
For me as an opinion. Linux is FAR supirior than windows in any platform. But thats just my opinion.
insomnia:
quote:Originally posted by -=Solaris.M.K.A=-:
I know that i'm using it as a desktop. I never like the NT line of M$ products!
For me as an opinion. Linux is FAR supirior than windows in any platform. But thats just my opinion.
--- End quote ---
An opinion?
That's without any doubt a FACT.
insomnia:
quote:Originally posted by restin256:
Yes, but if OpenDOS were more popular, people would make Window Managers like Fluxbox, Window Maker, or FVWM ported. Then, since it would already use the windows C:\, D:\, etc drive letter calling, all you'd need to do is intergrate Windows and DirectX API's. Then, you'd have yourself a Windows Replacement. The best part is that since it's open source, it's stable, less bloated, and unlike Windoze NT, it's fully DOS compatable.
--- End quote ---
But how long will you need it?
Only a few MS apps are usable.(without even being good)
GNU needs their own simular(and much better) apps.
Not those bad written MS ones.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version