Miscellaneous > Applications

ie5.0 for unix

<< < (2/2)

voidmain:
Speaking of "lynx", let's see if fuckmicrosoft.com is lynx approved. Yep, seems to work just fine!

svarga:
VoidMain,
surely there's almost none use MSIE at Unix, to say the truth I just wanted to compare how much it supports JavaScript events (compairing to Win) and JavaScript in general (they say almost the same as for general win version features-- i want to know what this almost means)...
As for other browsers you've listed, I use most of your list... by the way i use lynx for win also  

As for MS sources... I don't know if win98/me etc will be open source (at least in 10-30 years  ), but as for nt/2k/xp-- they surely won't never...
Most of people know that MS researched the Linux code... So I suspect that they've just stolen things they could combine with there idiot win 3.11/95... so they got nt etc..    

thanks for your comments!

voidmain:
Well there's no doubt with every release of Win they've added more *NIX features, however crippled they are.  I actually sort of got off on the MS track for a while thinking there was hope.  But then I woke up and smelled the coffee (java?).  I still have to do a little NT/2K server, terminal server and cluster work but I don't have to like it.  I now refuse to let that take up the majority of my time.  Now I am focusing on replacing all of that sort of stuff with Linux wherever possible.  As far as MS porting IE, if I recall the article on the page when I downloaded it, they hired a single Linux coding guru and he did the entire port.  Needless to say, how the product worked was directly proportional to the number of resources they put toward it.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page