Miscellaneous > Applications

apache vs iis

(1/2) > >>

habib:
hi,
although apache is just 15 mb vs iis over 50megs

apache is 75% on usage while iis about 20@.
apache is fast with unix.
apache is simple, but v need a gui editor for its configuration..
apache with php n mySql works very great... can beat iis asp with ms sql srvr..
;)

voidmain:

quote:Originally posted by Habib Ahmed:
hi,
although apache is just 15 mb vs iis over 50megs

apache is 75% on usage while iis about 20@.
apache is fast with unix.
apache is simple, but v need a gui editor for its configuration..
apache with php n mySql works very great... can beat iis asp with ms sql srvr..
;)
--- End quote ---


You are a smart man.  And there are several graphical configuration tools.  I personally prefer not using the graphical tools but Comanche, Webmin, Linuxconfig, and several others are available (Webmin is very good for a lot more than just Apache).

P.S. Find that Usama bin Laden character for us will ya?  We'll make it worth your while....

[ December 21, 2001: Message edited by: VoidMain ]

theangelofdeath69:
Very smart.  The new Apache, 2.0.28 Beta (yes, I like betas) is really stable and really good.  and it doesn't have approximately 5,445,447,228,164.74 security holes in it.

Get it.  Seriously.

Bateluer:
Apache is nice, no arguement there.

I've been playing with a beta of IIS 6 for the last couple of days.

voidmain:
I used Apache long before I started using IIS for some things at work.  I quit using IIS when 4.0 came out and went back to 100% Apache/*NIX Like everything else MS does, they just screw things up with each new release.  I thought 3.0 was the best version of IIS they ever did.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page