All Things Microsoft > Microsoft Hardware

CNet Propagates Mhz Myth, Goes "Hardcore"

<< < (2/3) > >>

rtgwbmsr:
But they didn't say anything about chip architectures did they?

You can't compare across chip architectures. They don't even regard architectures as an issue.

[ October 24, 2002: Message edited by: The_Muffin_Man/B0b ]

TheQuirk:

quote:Originally posted by Ex Eleven / b0b:
The last 3 are all $55 apart, so wheres that massive difference.
--- End quote ---


These are not your worthless Australian dollars.

TheQuirk:

--- Quote ---Originally posted by The_Muffin_Man/B0b:
Look at this:
 

Is someone paying CNet to put this stuff on? C'mon, they do so much pro-M$ work they should be paid for it.

Check the rest out (Including "Hardcore" applications like Digital Video   :D   )

http://computers.cnet.com/hardware/0-1018-8-20548580-1.html?tag=st.co.1018-8-20548580-16.dir.1018-8-20548580-1[/Q UOTE]

Big-fucking-deal. Are you trying to find things wrong in various articles? They're right. Why would you want to buy something that's just faster by a small amount of performance for an extra <insert large sum of money here>?

Next time try to find a wrong article; not a bad article that you're trying to make look like it was written by MS nazis.
--- End quote ---

hm_murdock:
cnet licks billy's hairy nutsack

Calum:
true but 'cnet propagates mhz myth' isn't really very surprising news for that very reason.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page