For blindfolded UNIX worshippers

[www.unixsucks.com]

http://www.unixsucks.com

Enjoy,

And I almost forgot - here is a headers from www.kmfms.com. Looks like PHP is vulnerable there.
And also why on so "Secure and good Apache" I can see just straight out in header what version of web server is being run and script engine? Very secure indeed.

HTTP/1.1 200 OK\r\n
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 21:46:14 GMT\r\n
Server: Apache/1.3.26 (Unix)  (Red Hat/Linux) mod_throttle/3.1.2 PHP/4.1.2\r\n
X-Powered-By: PHP/4.1.2\r\n
Connection: close\r\n
Content-Type: text/html\r\n
\r\n

[Master of Reality]

you can set apache to show or not show that

[Master of Reality]

quote:Windows built on NT kernel is extremely reliable system, there are system integrators over there which would guarantee you 99,99% of uptime on Windows OS (http://www.compaq.com/services/available/av_uptime.html, http://www.dell.com/us/en/epg/services/service_99_9.htm), I have not seen such claims from Linux distributors. The common problem with so called BSD (Blue Screen Of Death) in 90% of the cases called by hardware not being on HCL (Hardware Compatibility List) or drivers not signed by Microsoft or poorely written third party programs.

so how do you explain that at least the top 50 uptimes on webservers are all running on BSD/apache except one which is IRIX/netscape enterprise?
http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html

..and maybe you should try i spellchecker next time you create a website. I noticed on other pages you had some words that didnt exist, such as satanistic... you probly mean satanic.

[ August 20, 2002: Message edited by: Master of Reality / Bob ]

[www.unixsucks.com]

Pretty easy. Nobody cares about that site, wether it's running or not, secure or not, serves pages or not. Look at no.2 - wwwprod1.telia.com. Impressed? How secure is it? Here is headers which shows that it has not been updated for 2 years and subject to numorous exploits.
HTTP/1.1 200 OK\r\n
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 22:11:44 GMT\r\n
Server: Apache/1.3.0 (Unix) PHP/3.0.1\r\n
Connection: close\r\n
Content-Type: text/html\r\n
\r\n
I swear, give me colocation or hosting facility, I'll put IIS with single static page and would get the same results.
Also survey only take samples of single web servers which is not typical scenario in business since you usually have webfarms to handle traffic.

GReg

[www.unixsucks.com]

Hmmm,

As far as I remember from my experience with Solaris, you have to reboot after installation of major system patches upgrades and I beleive if owner of wwwprod1.telia.com has 2 year old Apache on that server, he might have old and vulnerable OS as well, which needs to be patched as well.

[Master of Reality]

umm.. i looked at that post of mine and realized it didnt make any/very much sense.
i'm sure NASA doesnt need security, thats why they run UNIX.
http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?mode_u=off&mode_w=on&site=spaceflight.nasa.gov&submit=Examine

[ August 20, 2002: Message edited by: Master of Reality / Bob ]

[www.unixsucks.com]

Content is not served by web server but the cache server. And what are you trying to say that UNIX or Apache running systems are not getting hacked?
http://www.apache.org/info/20010519-hack.html

HTTP/1.1 200 OK\r\n
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 22:31:05 GMT\r\n
Age: 34\r\n
Server: Apache/1.3.20 (Unix)\r\n
Last-Modified: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 19:35:06 GMT\r\n
Accept-Ranges: bytes\r\n
Content-Type: text/html\r\n
Content-Length: 22711\r\n
Etag: "e0ee-58b7-3d6299ea"\r\n
Via: 1.1 scnetcache1 (NetCache 4.0R4)\r\n
Connection: close\r\n

[Stryker]

I don't get it... You take the time to go to fuckmicrosoft.com. Then you take the time to sign up. I'm sure you've also been around exploring this site. But going through all this effort just to tell us that you dont like unix?

[www.unixsucks.com]

yes. As far as I can see right now you and people like you are bunch of happy kids living in happy dream world of glorified UNIX and bad Microsoft.
You are idolizing things and you need fresh air here to start thinking wether all things you beleive in are actually the truth.
Is not the whole purpose of newsgroups is to find the truth or at least express opinion? What is currently happening right now in this message board (without Microsoft backers) can be described as masturbation.

[eradicator]

quote:Originally posted by www.unixsucks.com:
yes. As far as I can see right now you and people like you are bunch of happy kids living in happy dream world of glorified UNIX and bad Microsoft.
You are idolizing things and you need fresh air here to start thinking wether all things you beleive in are actually the truth.
Is not the whole purpose of newsgroups is to find the truth or at least express opinion? What is currently happening right now in this message board (without Microsoft backers) can be described as masturbation.

hey! you only live a couple miles from me, maybe i can punch you in the face someday?

anyways, nobody cares about your opinion. this site is full of people that prefer BSD, Linux, Solaris, MacOS, BeOS, QNX, AtheOS, Amiga, etc. i doubt many people care what a microsoft junkie has to say, about 98% of the people that come here and "diss" alternate platforms have no idea what they are talking about.

feeding the trolls gets rather boring.

ah, i just have to do this:      :rolleyes:        :eek:    :confused:        :mad:    :cool:

[voidmain]

Could someone please move this to either the Dead Thread Zone or the Windows section?  Doesn't belong here.

[Bazoukas]

LOLOLOL!!!

 Aaaaalll that site just to come here and try to piss off.

  Yohoooooo you sure are a clever one.

  Now that am slowly getting more and more into computing, (programming) I realize one thing.
 
   People that prefer Windows are just plain fuking idiots. I am not talking about the average Joe that doesnt know any better when it comes to computers and all that. I am talking about the guy that claims to be in the IT field and prefers Windows.

[Master of Reality]

quote:Originally posted by VoidMain:
Could someone please move this to either the Dead Thread Zone or the Windows section?  Doesn't belong here.

why wouldnt a thread against UNIX be in the UNIX forum?

[Master of Reality]

i just felt the need to post some of the defacement of sites statistics from alldas.org
it seems that windows computers (running anything) have over 20000 defacements. Linux 8000, OpenBSD 266, Solaris 1400.

[voidmain]

Yep, only 25% of the web servers out there are M$ yet they have twice as many defacements as all of the other web servers combined.  Gee, I think I'll switch to M$/IIS.... NOT.