« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Noatun vs. XMMS  (Read 736 times)

Refalm

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,183
  • Kudos: 704
  • Sjembek!
    • RADIOKNOP
Noatun vs. XMMS
« on: 8 October 2003, 21:59 »
I must say I like Noatun better than XMMS. Not only because of the many plug-ins, but because it looks better than XMMS (XMMS is compiled with GTK+ 1, not 2, which makes any program look like shit), the sound is much better, it got sound effects that make SRS WoW (Windows Media Player) look amateuristic, and you can choose from multiple GUI's (simple, excellent, Kaiman, K-Jofol, Milkchocolate, Winamp-like).

And, XMMS seems to be sponsored by 4Front technologies, which is an evil corperation that makes shareware Linux sound drivers (30 day trial), while open source sounddrivers are way better.

EDIT: And did I mention that Noatun has support for Winamp skins like XMMS does? And that you can add by file extentions like Winamp can?
XMMS is now version 1.28 and they still compile it for GTK 1.

If you show your friends Linux, don't run XMMS. It's nothing compared to Noatun.

[ October 08, 2003: Message edited by: Refalm ]

Logged

flap

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,268
  • Kudos: 137
Noatun vs. XMMS
« Reply #1 on: 8 October 2003, 22:42 »
quote:
XMMS is compiled with GTK+ 1, not 2, which makes any program look like shit


XMMS is skinned - what difference does the GTK version have on how it looks?
Logged
"While envisaging the destruction of imperialism, it is necessary to identify its head, which is none other than the United States of America." - Ernesto Che Guevara

http://counterpunch.org
http://globalresearch.ca

erosnemesis

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 67
  • Kudos: 0
Noatun vs. XMMS
« Reply #2 on: 9 October 2003, 00:57 »
Where do you get noatun so i can see for my self how much better noatun is than XMMS
Logged
"If money isnt made from trees, then why do banks have branches"

Faust

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,223
  • Kudos: 0
Noatun vs. XMMS
« Reply #3 on: 9 October 2003, 03:33 »
Logged
Yesterday it worked
Today it is not working
Windows is like that
 -- http://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/error-haiku.html

flap

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,268
  • Kudos: 137
Noatun vs. XMMS
« Reply #4 on: 9 October 2003, 03:43 »
The correct answer was STFW
Logged
"While envisaging the destruction of imperialism, it is necessary to identify its head, which is none other than the United States of America." - Ernesto Che Guevara

http://counterpunch.org
http://globalresearch.ca

JesusRocks

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 65
  • Kudos: 0
    • http://X11.ROCKS.IT
Noatun vs. XMMS
« Reply #5 on: 9 October 2003, 05:24 »
XMMS is fine.

I dont need any effects, they piss me off. I have no problem, and I dont listen to crappy European Techno cliche music that needs effects. I dont want effects fucking up the sound, I have a real stereo however unlike people with there Creative "Pussy" Rock Live systems and stuff.

Still I might try this other program.
Logged

Commander

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 242
  • Kudos: 52
Noatun vs. XMMS
« Reply #6 on: 9 October 2003, 08:16 »
is it just me or is the website really down??

didn;t really matter as i read up some specs from the google's cache.. (god bless google!)

the program looks interesting, but i'll stick with my xmms and mplayer!
Logged
Ballmer needs a firm kick in the ass.... (since he has no balls)

Fett101

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,581
  • Kudos: 85
    • http://fgmma.com
Noatun vs. XMMS
« Reply #7 on: 9 October 2003, 21:51 »
quote:
Originally posted by X11:
unlike people with there Creative "Pussy" Rock Live systems and stuff.


That's Industial Jungle Pussy Punk.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »