Author Topic: Anyone run real UNIX on real hardware?  (Read 844 times)

Bazoukas

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 866
  • Kudos: 140
    • http://whitehouse.com
Anyone run real UNIX on real hardware?
« Reply #15 on: 11 November 2002, 07:06 »
There is also TinyX. Its a trimed down version of X11.
web pagehttp://www.handhelds.org

http://www.rule-project.org
Yeah

choasforages

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,729
  • Kudos: 7
    • http://it died
Anyone run real UNIX on real hardware?
« Reply #16 on: 11 November 2002, 07:49 »
ummm, hello, bsd on a k6-III is real unix on real hardware. i can see the soure to bsd and touch the system/*not a good idea though*/ unlike windows, were i can "touch" the bsd or linux based system, i can only see windows in action, not "touch" it or anything, makes you think that you are hallucinating when using windows too much, its like there, buts its really not

[ November 10, 2002: Message edited by: choasforages ]

x86: a hack on a hack of a hackway
alpha, hewlett packed it A-way
ppc: the fruity way
mips: the graphical way
sparc: the sunny way
4:20.....forget the DMCA for a while!!!

Calum

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7,812
  • Kudos: 1000
    • Calum Carlyle's music
Anyone run real UNIX on real hardware?
« Reply #17 on: 12 November 2002, 16:19 »
chaosforages, just because you get source code doesn't mean it's unix. the majority of available systems allow you to have at least some of the source code. BSD is not real unix, as it was not developed by american telegraph and telephone company. And real hardware would be anything you could get that unix to run on, but since you'd probably have to change the code and recompile in order to get it to run, maybe it would no longer be unix. i agree with void main. unix is unix, and it isn't as well.  
quote:
Originally posted by -ks:
Wow, was not my intention to create such a stir, just expressing my opinion.  I've tried linux in the past and was not very impressed.  Sorry if it offends anyone.  I don't profess to know all the in's and out's as I don't do this for a living, I'm only a hobbyist.  I do have experience on many unix flavors and found IRIX to be about the easiest to work with, at least for me.  I started out with an old DEC PDP running 6th Edition, migrated to a VAX and MicroVAX, then the DECstation and VAXstations, all running Ultrix, but I did play around with RSTS/E and RSX a bit on the PDP's.  Experimented a little with NetBSD on the DEC hardware, then migrated to the SGI's and IRIX.  Currently have six systems in the collection along with two SUN SparcStation 5's running Solaris 8 at the moment.  Pic's available upon request      

 On a side note, I have two IBM systems available that I will probably never use and would like to get out of the basement due to space considerations.  They are and IBM System/36 Baby and an AS/400 Advanced 9402/3xx.  Both work fine, no problems, just don't have the time to do anything with them.  The System/36 I have all the original documentation, manuals, and software for, the AS/400 has only what's on the disks.  If anyone's interested, drop me a line by email.  I'd hate for these to end up in a dumpster.

-ks

Posted from Silicon Graphics R10k Indigo2 High Impact



That's an impressive lot of stuff you've got to use! i have very little experience of different systems and machines! maybe you don't like linux so much because of it's continuous work-in-progressness. It is something that sometimes irks me a bit too, that everything is always version 0.8.5beta and so on. very little projects want to claim they are ever finished. Still, this is a *good* thing. Open source linux projects are usually *nix/Xwindows projects which mean that any *nix system with X installed can run them. really, for most users, i can't see that there'd be much difference between SunOS running X, Solaris running X, Red Hat running X, Mandrake running X, BSD running X and so on. All the differences of course are in the administration, and even that is very similar from unix to unix, considering how different they really are!
As you say, it's just opinions, and i would love to have more experience of other systems so i could fill out my own opinion.

As for those two machines, what OSs can they run? DOS and CP/M? I haven't got a clue about either machine i am afraid. Not sure i would be able to take delivery all the way from Earth either...

PS and as for pictures, please do post them in the Shameless screenshots thread, i'd love to see them. There is a thread somewhere where people were posting pictures of their computer setup but i can't find it now, i thought it was in the lounge section... i might start a new one, unless somebody else does first...

[ November 12, 2002: Message edited by: [calum@localhost]$ ]

visit these websites and make yourself happy forever:
It's my music! | My music on MySpace | Integrational Polytheism

kshuff

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
  • Kudos: 0
    • http://www.users.fast.net/~kshuff
Anyone run real UNIX on real hardware?
« Reply #18 on: 13 November 2002, 03:38 »
That's an impressive lot of stuff you've got to use! i have very little experience of different systems and machines! maybe you don't like linux so much because of it's continuous work-in-progressness. It is something that sometimes irks me a bit too, that everything is always version 0.8.5beta and so on. very little projects want to claim they are ever finished. Still, this is a *good* thing. Open source linux projects are usually *nix/Xwindows projects which mean that any *nix system with X installed can run them. really, for most users, i can't see that there'd be much difference between SunOS running X, Solaris running X, Red Hat running X, Mandrake running X, BSD running X and so on. All the differences of course are in the administration, and even that is very similar from unix to unix, considering how different they really are!
As you say, it's just opinions, and i would love to have more experience of other systems so i could fill out my own opinion.

As for those two machines, what OSs can they run? DOS and CP/M? I haven't got a clue about either machine i am afraid. Not sure i would be able to take delivery all the way from Earth either...

PS and as for pictures, please do post them in the Shameless screenshots thread, i'd love to see them. There is a thread somewhere where people were posting pictures of their computer setup but i can't find it now, i thought it was in the lounge section... i might start a new one, unless somebody else does first...

 
 Thanks, if I ever get around to updating my homepage I'll have a section there, but will try to get some stuff on the thread in the mean time

-ks

Posted from Silicon Graphics 320 Visual Workstation