Author Topic: Need distro that requires little memory and slow CPU.  (Read 757 times)

edisav

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 48
  • Kudos: 0
Hey folx,

I have an old PC that has a P-MMX266 and 64MB of RAM. I need some distro that will work well with those. Slack runs to slow

Any other? I want to have an X-Windows system. This will be just a test (fuck around) machine.

ThnX!

psyjax

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,871
  • Kudos: 55
Need distro that requires little memory and slow CPU.
« Reply #1 on: 10 May 2003, 23:58 »
quote:
Originally posted by xinix:
Hey folx,

I have an old PC that has a P-MMX266 and 64MB of RAM. I need some distro that will work well with those. Slack runs to slow

Any other? I want to have an X-Windows system. This will be just a test (fuck around) machine.

ThnX!



umm... well, I spose you could use x11 with motif, or some other striped down bare bones WM. You could also scrounge up an old version of GNOME which is pretty light weight.

Linux command line should run nice and speedy I'm sure  ;)
Psyjax! I RULEZZZZ!!! HAR HAR HAR

flap

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,268
  • Kudos: 137
Need distro that requires little memory and slow CPU.
« Reply #2 on: 10 May 2003, 23:59 »
That machine is far from old/slow. What window manager were you using with slackware?
"While envisaging the destruction of imperialism, it is necessary to identify its head, which is none other than the United States of America." - Ernesto Che Guevara

http://counterpunch.org
http://globalresearch.ca


edisav

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 48
  • Kudos: 0
Need distro that requires little memory and slow CPU.
« Reply #3 on: 11 May 2003, 00:10 »
I use GNOME and KDE but quite honestly I prefer to stay away from Slack. It's either too hard or I'm too dumb.

I'd rather use a simpler distro that doesn't requiere so much tweaking.

ThnX!

KernelPanic

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,878
  • Kudos: 222
Need distro that requires little memory and slow CPU.
« Reply #4 on: 11 May 2003, 00:41 »
Try the Slackware based distribution Vector Linux. It has the speed of Slackware but does the configuation bits for you, it uses icewm so should be pretty and lightweight.

[ May 10, 2003: Message edited by: Tux ]

Contains scenes of mild peril.

flap

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,268
  • Kudos: 137
Need distro that requires little memory and slow CPU.
« Reply #5 on: 11 May 2003, 02:09 »
Slack is simple; that's why it needs tweaking. You should be able to run any modern distro on that machine, but I wouldn't use KDE or gnome on it.
"While envisaging the destruction of imperialism, it is necessary to identify its head, which is none other than the United States of America." - Ernesto Che Guevara

http://counterpunch.org
http://globalresearch.ca


Pantso

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,249
  • Kudos: 55
    • http://www.support-freesoftware.org
Need distro that requires little memory and slow CPU.
« Reply #6 on: 11 May 2003, 04:13 »
quote:
Originally posted by xinix:
Hey folx,

I have an old PC that has a P-MMX266 and 64MB of RAM. I need some distro that will work well with those. Slack runs to slow

Any other? I want to have an X-Windows system. This will be just a test (fuck around) machine.

ThnX!



Hmm, that's a bit difficult. Not that this machine is too old but KDE and GNOME have gotten bigger and "heavier". You could use another much lighter Window Manager like Xfce, Enlightenment etc though.

Faust

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,223
  • Kudos: 0
Need distro that requires little memory and slow CPU.
« Reply #7 on: 11 May 2003, 05:31 »
blackbox.  blackbox with the rancor theme.  blackbox.   ;)
Yesterday it worked
Today it is not working
Windows is like that
 -- http://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/error-haiku.html

preacher

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 858
  • Kudos: 107
    • http://kansascity.cjb.net
Need distro that requires little memory and slow CPU.
« Reply #8 on: 11 May 2003, 15:37 »
Well I use mandrake on my 200 mhz with 64mb ram. That and I use kde 3.1. I wont say it isnt slow, but it works. I have no trouble running LimeWire, Ogle, XMMS, Mozilla or anything else. I even can play bzflag and tuxracer as smooth as silk. Now Im working on Unreal Tournament too. Just because the box is old doesnt mean it is useless.
Kansas City Hustle
http://kansascity.cjb.net

choasforages

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,729
  • Kudos: 7
    • http://it died
Need distro that requires little memory and slow CPU.
« Reply #9 on: 11 May 2003, 18:38 »
think *BSD......
if you can get all the hardware working under one, you will be very very very happy

/*on that note im using slackware 9 at this moment, waiting for a faster computer and freebsd 5.x stable*/

and on that note, i run kde 3.0 under redhat 8.0 on my thinkpad 600,
x86: a hack on a hack of a hackway
alpha, hewlett packed it A-way
ppc: the fruity way
mips: the graphical way
sparc: the sunny way
4:20.....forget the DMCA for a while!!!

SAJChurchey

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 246
  • Kudos: 0
    • http://sajchurchey.htmlplanet.com
Need distro that requires little memory and slow CPU.
« Reply #10 on: 14 May 2003, 20:01 »
Most X Windows system requires at least 64MB just to run.  XWindows will more than likely run slow.  That's why most people just say use the command line.  You can try using a differnt Window Manager like WindowMaker on an older distro like RH 7.x or SuSE 7.x.
SAJChurchey                    

Calum

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7,812
  • Kudos: 1000
    • Calum Carlyle's music
Need distro that requires little memory and slow CPU.
« Reply #11 on: 14 May 2003, 21:19 »
quote:
Originally posted by xinix:
I use GNOME and KDE but quite honestly I prefer to stay away from Slack. It's either too hard or I'm too dumb.

I'd rather use a simpler distro that doesn't requiere so much tweaking.

ThnX!



there is nothing wrong with slack, so what does that leave?

as people have been saying, using the latest kde and gnome on that computer is not going to be very fast. use windowmaker, xfce, fvwm95 or enlightenment i suggest. Slack will run those fine on your computer.

If you really don't want to use slack, i suggest using peanut linux, or perhaps vector linux (although i could not get vector linux to run X with my video card), peanut uses enlightenment by default, it's a 100MB download or so, and takes up 500MB when installed.
No GNOME or KDE libs come with it though so be prepared to groan on about how you can't install anything.
visit these websites and make yourself happy forever:
It's my music! | My music on MySpace | Integrational Polytheism

LordWiccara

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 138
  • Kudos: 0
    • http://imdeadinside.servehttp.com
Need distro that requires little memory and slow CPU.
« Reply #12 on: 15 May 2003, 03:30 »
quote:
Originally posted by Tux:
Try the Slackware based distribution Vector Linux. It has the speed of Slackware but does the configuation bits for you, it uses icewm so should be pretty and lightweight.
]



Is VectorLinux 4.3 (i think) any good?
"One World, One Web, One Program " --Microsoft AD
"Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Furher" (One World, One Realm[or country], One leader) --Adolf Hitler

http://imdeadinside.servehttp.com

-Mike-


LordWiccara

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 138
  • Kudos: 0
    • http://imdeadinside.servehttp.com
Need distro that requires little memory and slow CPU.
« Reply #13 on: 15 May 2003, 03:31 »
quote:
Originally posted by ArmTheHomeless:


Is VectorLinux 4.3 (i think) any good?




Oops, i ment 3.2

and will it run nicely on a P233MMX with 108mb ram?
"One World, One Web, One Program " --Microsoft AD
"Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Furher" (One World, One Realm[or country], One leader) --Adolf Hitler

http://imdeadinside.servehttp.com

-Mike-