Author Topic: A few questions about Slackware and EvilEntity  (Read 1378 times)

Interscope

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 146
  • Kudos: 0
A few questions about Slackware and EvilEntity
« on: 11 December 2002, 01:11 »
Here goes:
1. Is Slackware really hard to install or is it just about taking a good look at the install documentation and clicking a few buttons?
2. WineX RPMs on Slackware, that stuff has the optimised OpenGL. Should I use the rpm-tar.gz converter or just get the cvs?
3. On the EvilE site it says that if you install EvilE it will wipe your windows partition off the face of the planet. Does it really do this(because i want to keep Win98se for wine and my sister, because she thinks linux is too hard, she only tried Mandrake 8.2... Dumb bitch)? And if it does, does it also remove your other fat32 partitions on the hard-drive?
4. Does the Slackware installer auto-detect (most of) your hardware or do you have to look for drivers for everything?
5. Is ALSA a bitch to install on Slack or not so hard?
6. And the final one, what's a better OS to install, Slackware 8.1 or Evil Entity. I use my comp for gaming, surfing and stuff, not things like servers. Although running it as a DS for a lan-party can happen.

I should probably say 'Thanks' but nobody will reply anyway.
Free it, goddamnit!

Computer security is very much like home security - you can take as many security precautions as you like but if you leave windows open, sooner or later you'll get broken into. - (Calum 2003)


choasforages

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,729
  • Kudos: 7
    • http://it died
A few questions about Slackware and EvilEntity
« Reply #1 on: 11 December 2002, 03:38 »
i only know that slackware is a bitch to install. its ranks up there with the *BSD's that are on the net. but it is awsome  when its installed. ive never toyed with evil entity. the only thing i have to say is read each and everything very carefully, and do so with a clear mind.
x86: a hack on a hack of a hackway
alpha, hewlett packed it A-way
ppc: the fruity way
mips: the graphical way
sparc: the sunny way
4:20.....forget the DMCA for a while!!!

TheQuirk

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,154
  • Kudos: 315
A few questions about Slackware and EvilEntity
« Reply #2 on: 11 December 2002, 05:53 »
I didn't have *any* problems with Slackware installing. I needed to configure X myself and I select the package that contained my NIC's "driver" (module), and that's about it that differs from any other distro (well, it still has a text-bsaed installer, but it really isn't that hard). . .

Master of Reality

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,249
  • Kudos: 177
    • http://www.bobhub.tk
A few questions about Slackware and EvilEntity
« Reply #3 on: 11 December 2002, 06:42 »
Evil Entity is extremely easy to install. It wont actually wipe out anything you dont specifiy whil installing. I have it running beside Windows and RedHat. It detects most of your hardware just like any other distrobution would. It isnt hard to install ALSA. And RPMs for Slackware suck, use RPM2TGZ if you can only find an RPM for a program. Anytime i tried isntalling an RPM in slackware it would have a huge list of failed dependencies (because it checks the rpm databse for dependenciesm, i think)
Disorder | Rating
Paranoid: Moderate
Schizoid: Moderate
Linux User #283518
'It takes more than a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the head to stop Bob'

beltorak0

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 223
  • Kudos: 0
    • http://www.angelfire.com/realm/beltorak
A few questions about Slackware and EvilEntity
« Reply #4 on: 11 December 2002, 21:34 »
quote:
And RPMs for Slackware suck, use RPM2TGZ if you can only find an RPM for a program. Anytime i tried isntalling an RPM in slackware it would have a huge list of failed dependencies (because it checks the rpm databse for dependenciesm, i think)  


I agree.  I am a die hard slack fan (after trying M/9 and it was SLOW as HELL).  But I am also a former-DOS-command line jockie, assembler programmer, and tinkerer.  You might consider it too difficult.  I currently do NOT recommend slackware to new linux users.

My probs with slackware:
no default firewall.  You have to set up your own; that requires a learning curve for iptables (or ipchains for the older 2.2.x kernels).  For decent stock firewalls, see the Netfilter Guruz Page.  They all have good commenting to assist learning iptables.  

RPM support is, at best, a joke.  After getting the hang of source-tarballs, i avoid RPMs whever possible.  If I have to use an RPM, I always select a version or two behind the latest, and install it with "rpm --no-deps -i {pkg}.rpm".  This gets around failed dependancies checks.  If it still won't work, throw in the "--force" and grabg a drink  ;) .  If the package doesn't work right, "rpm -U --no-deps [--force] {pkg}.rpm" results in "{pkg} not installed." and "rpm --no-deps {pkg}.rpm" results in "{pkg} already installed.".  I then try to configure the next version of the rpm and hope it works.  The only way I have gotten rpm's off my pute is by hunting down the files and deleting them.  Even the [re]build database options fail to correct the problem.

Slack isn't really difficult to install (especially the newbie of full options), but the package descriptions for the expert modes don't list all the necessary dependancies.  Installation configuration is via a color-console menu.  Might be a breath of fresh air for those dependant on GUIs.  Maybe not.

Tweeking slack consists of reading man pages and doing text edits (except of course for the window managers).  I prefer it this way, but those dependent on LinuxConf or drakeconfig (whatever it's called) will have another learning curve to surmount.  If that is the case, I suggest the book "Linux Complete".  It makes ample use of LinuxConf, but also tells you what it modifies and where.  Nice and newbie-friendly.

Advice for the brave:  maintain a ROOT LOG; a simple booklet where you write down EVERYTHING you do as root.  This will enable you to keep track of problems, and backtrack out of something that might have broken your system.

-- segfault article follows --
If Linux Distributions Were Airlines


If Linux Distributions Were Airlines

Red Hat Airlines:

The standard in air travel. Most people have flown Red Hat Air at one point or other. Some people like it and some people hate it and move on to one of the other airlines. Passengers are all treated the same; they get stuck in their seats and told not to ask questions -- everything will be taken care of for them. They should just sit back, relax, and not touch of the fancy controls under any circumstances, lest they send the plane into a tailspin. Red Hat Airlines is fabulously rich.

Mandrake Airlines:

Mandrake bought a truckload of planes from Red Hat, put new engines in them, re-painted them, and now run their own airline. Considered by many to be the most friendly airline for first-time flyers.

Corel Airlines:

A new player on the scene, Corel Air thinks it can be the airline of choice for a new generation of first-time pleasure flyers, and maybe even lure in some business travelers too. Their planes are big, brightly painted, and like Red Hat's they protect the innocent, clueless passengers from the dangerous buttons, switches and blinkenlights of the cockpit.

SuSe Airlines:

An airline out of Europe that tries to be everything for everyone and succeeds -- to a degree. Recently paid a huge sum of money to use a comic strip in its promotional material. (And after they finally named the lizard...)

Caldera OpenAirlines:

These guys go out of their way to make things comfortable for the business user. They've got a pretty terminal, pretty planes, really good in-flight movies, etc. But I had a bad experience with these guys once. They lost my luggage. Quite a mess, really. Ah well, such is life. I never flew with them again.

SlackAIR:

From a distance, their planes look just like everyone elses. But up close you can tell that they haven't been painted and little bits of wire stick out here and there. But onboard, the seats are comfortable enough and there are plenty of stewardesses available to help you readjust your seat if you manage to break it. There is no in-flight movie but if you get bored you are always welcome up in the cockpit. The pilots will be glad to let you try and fly the plane and are happy to let you push whatever buttons you want, even if you don't know what you're doing. Generally, novice flyers avoid SlackAIR as they've heard horror stories about newbies pressing the wrong button and causing the plane to explode.

Debian Airlines:

They have a single type of airplane; a huge sucker weighing 2400 tons and carrying just about everything you can imagine. They've got kitchen sinks, massage parlors, a paintball arena, and 294 types of cheese for sale in the onboard, 24-hour supermarket. You can see from the terminal they have a huge team of technicians working on their fleet, poking and prodding. Debian Air is the only choice for some: everything onboard is built 100% by union workers -- no shoddy, possibly dangerous, imports here.

For completeness, let's throw in some BSD...

NetAIR:

Pretty standard fare, with one primary selling point: they'll fly anywhere. There isn't anywhere they won't go. War zones, political hotbeds, Canada -- all fair game. Of course, they keep their planes in good condition and up to date.

FreeAIR:

Probably the most popular of the alternative airlines, FreeAIR is a favorite of business travelers and, well, pretty much everyone. They offer the same services as everyone else and have the same devoted following as the other airlines. Purportedly a good choice for first time BSD flyers.

OpenAIR:

SecureAIR really would be more appropriate. They've got armed guards at every door, armed guards on the plane -- even a fighter escort. Passengers are treated pretty respectably as long as they are willing to go through the security checkpoints.


Posted on Wed 15 Mar 09:33:56 2000 PST
Written by tpck
-----
see also If OSs were Airelines

-t.
from Attrition.Org
 
quote:
Like many times before, Microsoft is re-inventing the wheel and opting for something other than round.

-t.


Interscope

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 146
  • Kudos: 0
A few questions about Slackware and EvilEntity
« Reply #5 on: 11 December 2002, 18:07 »
I wonder what would happen if Windows would be an airline >  

Thanks for the replies. The main reason I'm going to get Slack/EvilE is because i want to play a bit with it and my comp is pretty slow on Mandrake, too. WineX isn't a big deal, I'll just get the CVS, I guess, I'm not planning on running games that need alot(Half-Life works fine on normal Wine, at least, thats what I have heard) or that don't have a native version(UT, UT2k3, RTCW)

I am a n00b. But I don't want to stay one forever. You have to take a step from time to time.

edit: Firewall isn't a big deal. I already have a unix firewall/router protecting me from the evils of the net.

[ December 11, 2002: Message edited by: Interscope ]

Free it, goddamnit!

Computer security is very much like home security - you can take as many security precautions as you like but if you leave windows open, sooner or later you'll get broken into. - (Calum 2003)


Faust

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,223
  • Kudos: 0
A few questions about Slackware and EvilEntity
« Reply #6 on: 11 December 2002, 18:19 »
quote:
I wonder what would happen if Windows would be an airline

Windows could never run an airline.  It would crash too much.    :D

[ December 11, 2002: Message edited by: Faust ]

Yesterday it worked
Today it is not working
Windows is like that
 -- http://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/error-haiku.html

lazygamer

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,146
  • Kudos: 0
A few questions about Slackware and EvilEntity
« Reply #7 on: 11 December 2002, 18:36 »
Awesome article! I was curious about Evil Entity and how it compares to Redhat 8.
For every hot Lesbian you see in a porno video, there is a fat, butch-like, or just downright ugly lesbian beeyotch marching in a gay pride parade, or bitching about same sex marriages. -Lazygamer on homosexuality

Master of Reality

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,249
  • Kudos: 177
    • http://www.bobhub.tk
A few questions about Slackware and EvilEntity
« Reply #8 on: 11 December 2002, 20:59 »
i would recomend Evil Entity to newish users. I spend about an equal amount of time in EvilE and RedHat8
Disorder | Rating
Paranoid: Moderate
Schizoid: Moderate
Linux User #283518
'It takes more than a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the head to stop Bob'

lazygamer

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,146
  • Kudos: 0
A few questions about Slackware and EvilEntity
« Reply #9 on: 11 December 2002, 21:26 »
I love the Evil Entity site, but EE seems so premature, whereas Redhat has been in development for many years. What seems interesting is the EE GUI, alternate GUI concepts are always interesting.

Sure EE may be easy to use and easy to install, but isn't there areas that it will suffer in, because it hasn't been in development for a longtime like Redhat? Or can it do EVERYTHING that Redhat can do?

What about default boot up times, configuration(being able to optimize it without being a pro), and speed?

[ December 11, 2002: Message edited by: lazygamer ]

For every hot Lesbian you see in a porno video, there is a fat, butch-like, or just downright ugly lesbian beeyotch marching in a gay pride parade, or bitching about same sex marriages. -Lazygamer on homosexuality

lazygamer

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,146
  • Kudos: 0
A few questions about Slackware and EvilEntity
« Reply #10 on: 12 December 2002, 21:08 »
*Bump*

Sorry about that, but im dying to know the answer.  
For every hot Lesbian you see in a porno video, there is a fat, butch-like, or just downright ugly lesbian beeyotch marching in a gay pride parade, or bitching about same sex marriages. -Lazygamer on homosexuality

voidmain

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,605
  • Kudos: 184
    • http://voidmain.is-a-geek.net/
A few questions about Slackware and EvilEntity
« Reply #11 on: 13 December 2002, 00:57 »
They use the same software any other distro uses, except they include Enlightenment instead of KDE and Gnome for a desktop environment. It's not much more than taking an existing distro, installing Enlightenment and creating our own theme for it.

[ December 12, 2002: Message edited by: void main ]

Someone please remove this account. Thanks...

lazygamer

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,146
  • Kudos: 0
A few questions about Slackware and EvilEntity
« Reply #12 on: 13 December 2002, 01:15 »
Oh yes, I forgot the golden rule, Linux A has the same secret super code that Linux B has. Ok when the time comes, I'll take a leap of faith.
For every hot Lesbian you see in a porno video, there is a fat, butch-like, or just downright ugly lesbian beeyotch marching in a gay pride parade, or bitching about same sex marriages. -Lazygamer on homosexuality

Master of Reality

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,249
  • Kudos: 177
    • http://www.bobhub.tk
A few questions about Slackware and EvilEntity
« Reply #13 on: 13 December 2002, 01:25 »
quote:
Originally posted by lazygamer:
I love the Evil Entity site, but EE seems so premature, whereas Redhat has been in development for many years. What seems interesting is the EE GUI, alternate GUI concepts are always interesting.

Sure EE may be easy to use and easy to install, but isn't there areas that it will suffer in, because it hasn't been in development for a longtime like Redhat? Or can it do EVERYTHING that Redhat can do?

What about default boot up times, configuration(being able to optimize it without being a pro), and speed?

[ December 11, 2002: Message edited by: lazygamer ]

actually i believe Evil Entity has had more development time then RedHat because it is based on slackware. Just the GUI stuff and the EvilE ackage tool hasnt, but you can use slackware TGZ packages in it anyway.
Disorder | Rating
Paranoid: Moderate
Schizoid: Moderate
Linux User #283518
'It takes more than a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the head to stop Bob'

voidmain

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,605
  • Kudos: 184
    • http://voidmain.is-a-geek.net/
A few questions about Slackware and EvilEntity
« Reply #14 on: 13 December 2002, 01:36 »
Slackware was started slightly before Red Hat, but that certainly doesn't mean more man hours of development time have been put into it. I see EE being to Slackware what Mandrake is to Red Hat.
Someone please remove this account. Thanks...