Author Topic: Problem with Mandrake 9.0  (Read 449 times)

Interscope

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 146
  • Kudos: 0
Problem with Mandrake 9.0
« on: 11 October 2002, 22:23 »
It just goes

"Detecting usb interface /etc/init.d/usb: line 37 /etc/modules.conf: read only file system"

Alot of time, then it stops, and then it [ OK ]'s nothing alot of time. But Linux itself won't start.

Need... Help...

Oh, and BTW, I don't have any USB ports on this crappy P.O.S.
Free it, goddamnit!

Computer security is very much like home security - you can take as many security precautions as you like but if you leave windows open, sooner or later you'll get broken into. - (Calum 2003)


voidmain

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,605
  • Kudos: 184
    • http://voidmain.is-a-geek.net/
Problem with Mandrake 9.0
« Reply #1 on: 11 October 2002, 23:13 »
I don't use Mandrake but can't you do an interactive startup (press 'I' for Interactive)?  If so, bypass the "usb" service when starting up interactively. Once booted, turn off the USB service since you have no plans of using it:

# /sbin/chkconfig usb off
Someone please remove this account. Thanks...

pkd_lives

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 554
  • Kudos: 0
Problem with Mandrake 9.0
« Reply #2 on: 11 October 2002, 23:17 »
Well below is the link to the errata page. Where you can report bugs as well.

http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/errata.php3#install

However you probably have that. So if you go to the old 8.2 errata page there is a compaq bug that has a patch used to bypass the USB detection. You might want to try that. I think there is a way to tell your system not to search for USB, but I don't know how I'm afraid.

Not very helpful I know, but it might point you in the right direction.

Of course this is biased towards an install.

[ October 11, 2002: Message edited by: pkd ]

Tough - Adapt or die : Read The Fucking Manual.

Local Area Network in Australia: the LAN down under.


TheQuirk

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,154
  • Kudos: 315
Problem with Mandrake 9.0
« Reply #3 on: 12 October 2002, 01:26 »
Heh, in your sig, isn't it the same image the guy put on Xmms' website when he hacked it?

I have a tarball of the website when it was hacked  ;)