Microsoft's resource page for competing with Linux

[slave]

Funny, I didn't know Microsoft knew how to "compete."

http://members.microsoft.com/partner/salesmarketing/salestools/competitivesellinglinux/default.aspx

[jasonlane]

hmmm, yup all balanced views there. What a joke, what is wrong with M$.

It's my dream to see M$ totally destroyed, perhaps then the people that really care about doing things right can actually get on with some productive work.

[The Anti-Microsoft]

Everyone knows Microsoft is anti-Linux and anti-Unix.  Didn't Microsoft make Xenix, a Unix-based OS, in 1980?

[ October 12, 2003: Message edited by: The Anti-Microsoft ]

[mushrooomprince]

quote: It

[Enmity]

Every single person that believes it should be shot.
Damn, who's left in the world now?  :confused:

[solarismka]

agree, windows is a wast of time and money.

[jasonlane]

quote:Originally posted by The Anti-Microsoft:
.........Didn't Microsoft make Xenix, a Unix-based OS, in 1980?

Yup that was about the only good thing M$ every really came up with. Also I believe that it wasn't stolen as such, like everything else they "produce". Thing was though they couldn't "own" it, hence they wouldn't be able to "own" the users of such a system. So Bill said, "Nah!, this DOS crap will make us more money".

[Laukev7]

Everyone had a UNIX back then. Apple had A/UX, Commodore had AMIX (Amiga UNIX), even Atari had their own brand of UNIX. Xenix was nothing creative nor original; Microsoft had only licenced the code from AT&T, like the others.

http://www.computerhope.com/unix/xenix.htm

[jasonlane]

That's why I said

 

quote: it wasn't stolen as such

     

Many of the developers at the fledging the M$ Vole central hated the fact the this was being dropped, it actually worked.   :confused:  

But you're right it wasn't creative or original, It's bad grammar to use these words in a sentence containing any reference to M$.          

[ October 13, 2003: Message edited by: Zardoz ]