Author Topic: Filemanager recomendations  (Read 624 times)

Faust

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,223
  • Kudos: 0
Filemanager recomendations
« on: 29 March 2003, 16:28 »
Can anyone recommend a good file manager for debian?
(Ie I would prefer it to be apt-get able.)
Preferably not:
Worker
MC
Konqueror (horrible w/ long filenames)
Galeon
Also I'm using the blackbox wm primarily so I would prefer something that does not require me to install a new wm (like gnome or kde both of which suck.)
Yesterday it worked
Today it is not working
Windows is like that
 -- http://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/error-haiku.html

Master of Reality

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,249
  • Kudos: 177
    • http://www.bobhub.tk
Filemanager recomendations
« Reply #1 on: 29 March 2003, 20:36 »
ya i usually just use bash to browse around my filesystem. Cant KDE programs run under blackbox somehow?... but you dont like konqueror anyways.
Disorder | Rating
Paranoid: Moderate
Schizoid: Moderate
Linux User #283518
'It takes more than a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the head to stop Bob'

slave

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,136
  • Kudos: 0
    • http://www.fuckmicrosoft.com
Filemanager recomendations
« Reply #2 on: 29 March 2003, 22:28 »
konqueror all teh way!!! combined with bash

Siplus

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 522
  • Kudos: 43
    • http://www.siplus.org
Filemanager recomendations
« Reply #3 on: 30 March 2003, 00:39 »
nautilus (spelling?)

it's what i use in GNOME on Redhat 8


http://www.siplus.org

"Your computer is already fucked up by having Windows
on it, you can only unfuck it up by installing Linux."
-- void main (old school MES member)


Desktop: Athlon 2600/ 768mb DDR266
--Running: Ubuntu 5.10, FC4, Win2k
 (Also, Unbuntu 6-06:5, 5.04; Fedora Core 5, WinXP, but none of these are used much)
12" Powerbook: 1.5 Ghz G4 PowerPC / 1.25 GB DDR333
--Running: Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger

Calum

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7,812
  • Kudos: 1000
    • Calum Carlyle's music
Filemanager recomendations
« Reply #4 on: 30 March 2003, 05:35 »
how about gentoo?

http://www.obsession.se/gentoo/

i haven't used it much yet, but unlike konqueror and nautilus it does not rely on a shitload of dependencies to get it working. it's been designed to be lightweight and portable while the other two are integrated and heavy.

i think it looks a lot better than that shitty xftree (which is the default file manager in XFce).
visit these websites and make yourself happy forever:
It's my music! | My music on MySpace | Integrational Polytheism

Fett101

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,581
  • Kudos: 85
    • http://fgmma.com
Filemanager recomendations
« Reply #5 on: 30 March 2003, 09:12 »
Any file managers like Explorer. I can't stand of of the ones I've run across

Fett101

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,581
  • Kudos: 85
    • http://fgmma.com
Filemanager recomendations
« Reply #6 on: 1 April 2003, 04:38 »
Guess not, huh...

Master of Reality

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,249
  • Kudos: 177
    • http://www.bobhub.tk
Filemanager recomendations
« Reply #7 on: 1 April 2003, 06:59 »
quote:
Originally posted by Fett101:
Guess not, huh...
i cant think of any... konqueror is somewhat resembles it.
Disorder | Rating
Paranoid: Moderate
Schizoid: Moderate
Linux User #283518
'It takes more than a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the head to stop Bob'

Calum

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7,812
  • Kudos: 1000
    • Calum Carlyle's music
Filemanager recomendations
« Reply #8 on: 1 April 2003, 12:55 »
konqueror is a bit like more recent 'explorer's and the one i mentioned, gentoo, looks a bit like what the windows 3.11 file manager might be like if it had been continued and modernised to this date.

oh yes and i haven't tried it yet, but how about xfm as a file manager in response to the original question?

[ April 01, 2003: Message edited by: Calum: crusader for peace & freedom ]

visit these websites and make yourself happy forever:
It's my music! | My music on MySpace | Integrational Polytheism