Author Topic: Companies don't trust MS, but use it anyway  (Read 764 times)

rtgwbmsr

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,257
  • Kudos: 0
    • http://www.akgames.net
Companies don't trust MS, but use it anyway
« on: 2 April 2003, 06:14 »
http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,6221225%255E15306,00.html

 
quote:
IT managers don't trust MS: survey
James Riley
April 01, 2003

NEARLY three-quarters of enterprise-level IT security chiefs don't trust Microsoft security, according to new research from Forrester.

Yet the same survey found that nine out of ten of these users have deployed sensitive applications on Windows, regardless.

The Forrester "Can Microsoft be secure?" paper surveyed 35 IT security specialists in the US from companies with $US1 billion or more in annual revenues.

Some 77 per cent of those surveyed cited security as their top concern when deploying Windows applications.

Yet Forrester maintains Microsoft has suffered unfair criticism of its security efforts, claiming the company's track record is "both better and more complicated than conventional wisdom suggests".


Forrester suggests that although there are improvements Microsoft could make to security practices, the blame for incidents often rests with the users themselves.

The report points to major worm and virus attacks, and says Microsoft generally issued patches well before outbreaks. The company issued a patch for the Nimda vulnerability nearly a year before that worm's release, and issues a patch for SQL Slammer more than six months before it brought down a major bank

cahult

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,186
  • Kudos: 182
Companies don't trust MS, but use it anyway
« Reply #1 on: 3 April 2003, 07:39 »
They are mindless drones, most of them. Others don
"The gentleman is dead, the feminists killed him" Anonymous

mc0282

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 124
  • Kudos: 0
Companies don't trust MS, but use it anyway
« Reply #2 on: 3 April 2003, 08:42 »
Like i said before, company are lazy to learn a new OS and they're in love with the  GUI. so they would suck up to micropirate..
huh, what?

theangelofdeath69

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 156
  • Kudos: 0
    • http://www.kaltemartech.com/
Companies don't trust MS, but use it anyway
« Reply #3 on: 28 April 2003, 13:59 »
You know, I'm sure there's a Windows-like GUI for Linux...
Specifications are for the weak and timid!
You question the worthiness of my code? I should kill you where you stand!
Indentation?! - I will show you how to indent when I indent your skull!
What is this talk of 'release'? Klingons do not make software 'releases'. Our software 'escapes' leaving a bloody trail of designers and quality assurance people in its wake.
Klingon function calls do not have 'parameters' - they have 'arguments' - and they ALWAYS WIN THEM.
Debugging? Klingons do not debug. Our software does not coddle the weak.
A TRUE Klingon Warrior does not comment on his code!
Klingon software does NOT have BUGS. It has FEATURES, and those features are too sophisticated for a Romulan pig like you to understand.
You cannot truly appreciate Dilbert unless you've read it in the original Klingon.
Our users will know fear and cower before our software! Ship it! Ship it and let them flee like the dogs they are!