« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: benchmark  (Read 795 times)

voidmain

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,605
  • Kudos: 184
    • http://voidmain.is-a-geek.net/
benchmark
« Reply #15 on: 3 September 2002, 20:47 »
quote:
Originally posted by Tux:
ps. Check this thread.


Is that link correct? It points to this thread.
Logged
Someone please remove this account. Thanks...

KernelPanic

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,878
  • Kudos: 222
benchmark
« Reply #16 on: 3 September 2002, 20:48 »
Fixed it.
Logged
Contains scenes of mild peril.

Ice-9

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 322
  • Kudos: 0
    • http://users.pandora.be/Ice9
benchmark
« Reply #17 on: 3 September 2002, 21:52 »
In fact if you plan to stick with the Quake series you could switch to Linux, if not follow Chooco's advice and stick with Win for gaming.
I run Quake III in Win2K and linux, it feels about the same BUT ..........
If I run a timedemo with demo four I get 217 frames/second in Win2K and 243 in Linux, with the same version of NVidia drivers for my Geforce 3 Ti200.
Logged
He was sitting on a rock. He was barefoot. His feet were frosty with ice-nine .....

Stryker

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,258
  • Kudos: 41
benchmark
« Reply #18 on: 3 September 2002, 22:51 »
I guess that explains it, me and my ps1...
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »