Author Topic: Internet explorer on linux desktop  (Read 681 times)

RudeCat7

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 431
  • Kudos: 109
Internet explorer on linux desktop
« on: 7 November 2002, 05:44 »
This just seems so wrong....

xandros desktop   :eek:  

Xandros Linux Home

[ November 06, 2002: Message edited by: RudeCat8.0 ]

*meow!* I didn't say Linux was easier, I said it was better, Dumbass!

Doctor V

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 661
  • Kudos: 0
Internet explorer on linux desktop
« Reply #1 on: 7 November 2002, 06:38 »
I'd put Xandron in the same category as Lindows.  Better than M$ winblows, but not by much.

V

emh

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 254
  • Kudos: 0
Internet explorer on linux desktop
« Reply #2 on: 7 November 2002, 06:59 »
I favor methods to make Linux more accessible to the average user.  And part of that accessibility also means being able to run some of the programs one is used to running in Windows, so they don't have to give up their old software, at least not right away.  When they're ready to upgrade, either there will be Linux native ports of their favorite applications, or they'll move on to Linux native applications.

Of course, this could also mean vendors will never make a Linux native port, since they apparently can run Windows software so well.  But if Windows starts getting used less and less, and Linux more and more, I think it will be likely that vendors will port to Linux natively.

There is one major advantage of Xandros over Lindows, though.  You still set up user accounts when installing, rather than doing everything as root like Lindows does.

Fett101

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,581
  • Kudos: 85
    • http://fgmma.com
Internet explorer on linux desktop
« Reply #3 on: 7 November 2002, 07:17 »
Wow. Linux now has a browser I can enjoy. I just couldn't get comfy with the other alternatives. Either way, Linux might be one step closer to an alternative OS to me...

Doctor V

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 661
  • Kudos: 0
Internet explorer on linux desktop
« Reply #4 on: 7 November 2002, 07:25 »
quote:
Originally posted by emh:
I favor methods to make Linux more accessible to the average user.  And part of that accessibility also means being able to run some of the programs one is used to running in Windows, so they don't have to give up their old software, at least not right away.  When they're ready to upgrade, either there will be Linux native ports of their favorite applications, or they'll move on to Linux native applications.

Of course, this could also mean vendors will never make a Linux native port, since they apparently can run Windows software so well.  But if Windows starts getting used less and less, and Linux more and more, I think it will be likely that vendors will port to Linux natively.

There is one major advantage of Xandros over Lindows, though.  You still set up user accounts when installing, rather than doing everything as root like Lindows does.




I do agree with what emh is saying, it is true for many users that a switch from windows to Lindows or Xnadros may be much simpler than to a pure Linux distro.  And its also true that Xandros dosn't suffer from what is likely Lindow's biggest problem, always running as root.

But still, seeing Windows's ultimate tool of mass domination (IE) on a Linux platform just gives me the willies.  Does Xandros come with Mozilla?  I think these distros should be used as gateways only.  Only to get someone used to Linux, then they should switch to a real distro.  Even still, the newer Linux distros arn't that difficult.

Lets think to the future a minute.  Heres what will happen.  Linux distros will become ever easier, and changing from windows to Linux will be almost hassle free.  But, M$ will release new software that is specifically made to be incompatible with Linux.  Later Palladium comes around, and all M$ applications are immediately restricted to M$ Palladium Windows only.  Hense, M$ uses their applications to trap people in a windows upgrade cycle.  While Lindows and Xandros may free people a little, as long as they are using windows applications instead of their perfectly functional alternatives, they will still be in the endless M$ $upgrade$ cycle.

V

Bazoukas

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 866
  • Kudos: 140
    • http://whitehouse.com
Internet explorer on linux desktop
« Reply #5 on: 7 November 2002, 07:57 »
Dude, you can lead a Horse to the water and the horse may be so stupid that it may piss in it.

  Face it, people as a whole are LAZY. They dont want to think or learn.  

 We are living in the age of fast food, fast sex, fast marriages, fast everything because we are too lazy to work and think.
Yeah

rtgwbmsr

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,257
  • Kudos: 0
    • http://www.akgames.net
Internet explorer on linux desktop
« Reply #6 on: 7 November 2002, 08:05 »
quote:
Originally posted by bazoukas:
...fast sex...


What age are you living in? Don't rush the good things. Enjoy them while they last

 

Master of Reality

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,249
  • Kudos: 177
    • http://www.bobhub.tk
Internet explorer on linux desktop
« Reply #7 on: 7 November 2002, 08:09 »
quote:
Originally posted by RudeCat8.0:
This just seems so wrong....

xandros desktop    :eek:  

Xandros Linux Home

[ November 06, 2002: Message edited by: RudeCat8.0 ]


meh its not soo bad. It runs OpenOffice and Mozilla... you can run Explorer if you really want to, but people will be to lazy to install it and try to run it.
Disorder | Rating
Paranoid: Moderate
Schizoid: Moderate
Linux User #283518
'It takes more than a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the head to stop Bob'

Bazoukas

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 866
  • Kudos: 140
    • http://whitehouse.com
Internet explorer on linux desktop
« Reply #8 on: 7 November 2002, 08:15 »
quote:
Originally posted by The_Muffin_Man/B0b:


What age are you living in? Don't rush the good things. Enjoy them while they last

     



 Sound advice   :D
Yeah