Author Topic: FileSystem Question  (Read 428 times)

Windows_SuX_@$$

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 233
  • Kudos: 0
FileSystem Question
« on: 26 September 2003, 23:59 »
I had installed Knoppix on my HD a few days agao, I chose ReiserFS... I want to know if its any good or if I had maybe made a wrong choice... Thanks

(Don't Say Knoppix Sucks)
Signatures can appear at the bottom of your posts. This option may be disabled by the message board administrators at any time, however. You may use UBB Code in your signature, but not HTML. UBBCode Images are permitted.

Seth

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 45
  • Kudos: 0
FileSystem Question
« Reply #1 on: 27 September 2003, 01:37 »
quote:
I had installed Knoppix on my HD a few days agao, I chose ReiserFS... I want to know if its any good or if I had maybe made a wrong choice... Thanks  


From my understanding, it is a journalled filesystem similar to ext3 except it works better on large parttions with lots of small files.
Red hat seem to prefer ext 3 and SuSE goes with RS (by defaults when installing their OSs).
I don't think it makes much of difference in a PC, but for a large scale stuff I guess it depends on what you are trying to do with your machines (SMP or otherwise) -
 reading/writing
 data warehousing etc.

Calum

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7,812
  • Kudos: 1000
    • Calum Carlyle's music
FileSystem Question
« Reply #2 on: 27 September 2003, 03:10 »
i always find reiser to be less stable (or less useful) than ext3. i suspect this is because you can mount ext3 as an old ext2 filesystem for the purpose of recovery disks etc. if you use aknoppix CD as your recovery disk, this isn'taproblem but i still use tomsrtbt which doesn't support reiserfs, and i simply stick with ext3 because it works and i understand how it works as much as i need to.
visit these websites and make yourself happy forever:
It's my music! | My music on MySpace | Integrational Polytheism