« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Mac OS X = Ugly  (Read 987 times)

choasforages

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,729
  • Kudos: 7
    • http://it died
Mac OS X = Ugly
« Reply #15 on: 8 February 2003, 01:36 »
true, i like ultralightwieghter stuff like windowmaker and fluxbox, and heavy stuff like kde with mosfet's liquid installed.
Logged
x86: a hack on a hack of a hackway
alpha, hewlett packed it A-way
ppc: the fruity way
mips: the graphical way
sparc: the sunny way
4:20.....forget the DMCA for a while!!!

Pissed_Macman

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,499
  • Kudos: 0
    • http://www.macrevolution.tk
Mac OS X = Ugly
« Reply #16 on: 12 February 2003, 16:52 »
From what I've seen of it, Linux is what Windows should have looked like.
Logged

slave

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,136
  • Kudos: 0
    • http://www.fuckmicrosoft.com
Mac OS X = Ugly
« Reply #17 on: 12 February 2003, 20:40 »
Gnome with bluecurve kinda reminds me of a mix between OS 9 and Windows 2000.  The way I have it set up anyway, with the menubar on top.
Logged

Calum

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7,812
  • Kudos: 1000
    • Calum Carlyle's music
Mac OS X = Ugly
« Reply #18 on: 12 February 2003, 20:56 »
gnome in red hat 8 is the best default GUI setup i have seen on linux so far. not that it couldn't be better, but they set it up to look nice, and even kde looks quite nice out of the box in red hat 8.
Logged
visit these websites and make yourself happy forever:
It's my music! | My music on MySpace | Integrational Polytheism
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »