Operating Systems > macOS

Apple Marklar????

(1/2) > >>

creedon:
It seems that Aplle has decided to port OSX to the x86 achitecture.  As a completely uninformed computer user (as far as Apple goes) I'm interested to the point that I know OSX is unix based.  Have any of the Apple-heads that post here heard anything about this?  I have a feeling that, although it would be nice to have another player on the feild, Apple seems to be just as proprietary about their OS as Microsoft is.
Any comments?

rtgwbmsr:
Yes, OSX was ported to x86. Why? It may be a backup plan of sorts, or an experiment. Will it ever be released? Probably not.

The OSX core is already availible for x86 in the thing called Darwin. All they really had to do was port the aqua layer.

EDIT: Mods, this belongs in the Mac forum.
EDIT2: Thanks whoever moved this here.

[ December 29, 2002: Message edited by: The Muffin Man ]

dot.this:
This rumor has been going around since Apple first announced OS X. That's all it is-- a rumor.

Apple sells computers. If they made OS X available for x86 boxen, people might be less inclined to buy Apple hardware. Plus, they'd probably piss off Microsoft, who is one of the most important authors of Mac software.

xyle_one:
if something happened, and apple was pretty much doomed. i can deffinetely see them releasing their os on the x86. it would also be kick ass to release it openSource.

hm_murdock:
if something happened to them, I don't doubt that they'd just throw all of it out there.

OS X, OS 9, parts of Copland, Rhapsody, any parts of Taligent that are left, Quicktime, all of it would go open source.

They'd do it just to undermine MS. And I think it would go far beyond undermining them. It would mean that even without Apple, the Mac would still live. People could buy PPC mainboards and run OS X (or OS 9 if they were inclined) because the OS could be adapted for new boards not built by Apple.

The Mac would then be the "open computer"... even more than PCs. And MS would face the beginning of the end at last!

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

Go to full version