Miscellaneous > The Lounge
Star Trek
hm_murdock:
btw... as for bringing back Roddenberry?
NO
That man fractured Trek. He trashed many of his best creations (TAS for instance) and threw a hissy fit about Harve Bennett's movies.
If they need anybody back, it's Harve. His Trek flicks were free from crappy technobabble and other such bullshit.
Paladin9:
quote:Originally posted by JimmyJames: GenSTEP Founder:
btw... as for bringing back Roddenberry?
NO
That man fractured Trek. He trashed many of his best creations (TAS for instance) and threw a hissy fit about Harve Bennett's movies.
--- End quote ---
Are you sure? Roddenberry created star trek!!! If it wernt for him, there would be no star trek. Besides, Hard Bennett had nothing to do with TNG anyway.
hm_murdock:
uh... you're right. Harve Bennett produced ST 2, 3, 4, 5. they were the best ever. Trek was never better. no stupid ass technobabble, no contrivances... no cliches. just a dramatic story. the equipment didn't matter.
blame it on the royal fucktards (Roddenberry and Berman) to create the crappy, cliche, technobabble-filled crapfest that was TNG
as for Roddenberry... he created it, but he didn't give a shit about it. he was lazy. he didn't even want to say what year "Star Trek" happened in.
weak
Refalm:
One thing I didn't like about every Star Trek was the "extra syndrome". You can see clear examples of this in season 1 of Voyager (in other seasons, they casted an extra in a few episodes first, before he/she got killed).
For example, the captain and the staff and someone you've never seen before go on an away mission. They encounter a hostile species. Now guess who's going to be killed first?
I always hated that BS in Star Trek.
hm_murdock:
it's a cliche. Star Trek operates on them.
they think having death there is "dramatic"... but you can't actually put these main chars in any real danger. so, you kill off these "namless" people.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version