Author Topic: Star Trek  (Read 5825 times)

cahult

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,186
  • Kudos: 182
Star Trek
« Reply #15 on: 19 July 2004, 05:16 »
quote:
Originally posted by Refalm:
One thing I didn't like about every Star Trek was the "extra syndrome". You can see clear examples of this in season 1 of Voyager (in other seasons, they casted an extra in a few episodes first, before he/she got killed).
For example, the captain and the staff and someone you've never seen before go on an away mission. They encounter a hostile species. Now guess who's going to be killed first?    

I always hated that BS in Star Trek.



Hmm, Bones was killed in one episode, but brought back to life....
"The gentleman is dead, the feminists killed him" Anonymous

Paladin9

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 696
  • Kudos: 263
Star Trek
« Reply #16 on: 19 July 2004, 10:37 »
quote:
Originally posted by Refalm:
One thing I didn't like about every Star Trek was the "extra syndrome". You can see clear examples of this in season 1 of Voyager (in other seasons, they casted an extra in a few episodes first, before he/she got killed).
For example, the captain and the staff and someone you've never seen before go on an away mission. They encounter a hostile species. Now guess who's going to be killed first?    

I always hated that BS in Star Trek.



Ha!  So true.

 
quote:
Originally posted by JimmyJames:
uh... you're right. Harve Bennett produced ST 2, 3, 4, 5. they were the best ever. Trek was never better. no stupid ass technobabble, no contrivances... no cliches. just a dramatic story. the equipment didn't matter.

blame it on the royal fucktards (Roddenberry and Berman) to create the crappy, cliche, technobabble-filled crapfest that was TNG

as for Roddenberry... he created it, but he didn't give a shit about it. he was lazy. he didn't even want to say what year "Star Trek" happened in.

weak



That is what you think.  1 just totally sucked ass.  All those people who liked it have a bad taste for movies.  I do not understand why people liked 2 so much.  It was not that great.  3  sucked except for that fact that it had Christopher Lloyd as a klingon.  That was cool.  4 was awesome.  5 was nothing but masturbation.  What was the point of 5?  Since when does the Enterprise-A have 78 decks?  Unless you like seeing mccoy eat "marshmellons" and kirk and spock hug in front of klingons, this movies sucked.  6 was good.  7 was good.  8 WAS BY FAR THE BEST FUCKING STAR TREK MOVIE!!!!  9 was ok.  10 was ok.

Jimmy, how come you mention 5 as one of the "best", but not 6?  Dont tell me you like 5 more then 6???
_________________________________________________
 
To create a new standard, it takes something that's not just a little bit different; it takes something that's really new and really captures people's imagination

hm_murdock

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,629
  • Kudos: 378
  • The Lord of Thyme
Star Trek
« Reply #17 on: 19 July 2004, 11:15 »
the 78-deck thing is a known duff.

did you also notice that the decks counted up from the bottom?

also, the brig is on like deck 7, near the base of the saucer... not at the bottom of the ship
Go the fuck ~

mobrien_12

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,138
  • Kudos: 711
    • http://www.geocities.com/mobrien_12
Star Trek
« Reply #18 on: 19 July 2004, 11:33 »
quote:
Originally posted by JimmyJames: GenSTEP Founder:
the 78-deck thing is a known duff.

did you also notice that the decks counted up from the bottom?



Also, there is no way to climb up a single vertical shaft from the bottom of the ship to the top of it.

[ July 19, 2004: Message edited by: M. O'Brien ]

In brightest day, in darkest night, no evil shall escape my sight....

mobrien_12

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,138
  • Kudos: 711
    • http://www.geocities.com/mobrien_12
Star Trek
« Reply #19 on: 19 July 2004, 11:37 »
The ST people want to get Shatner guest starring in Enterprise.

ARGH.
In brightest day, in darkest night, no evil shall escape my sight....

Orethrius

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,783
  • Kudos: 982
Star Trek
« Reply #20 on: 19 July 2004, 11:42 »
quote:
Originally posted by M. O'Brien:
The ST people want to get Shatner guest starring in Enterprise.

ARGH.



When I arrive at my destination, I am gonna kill Bill.   :cool:

Proudly posted from a Gentoo Linux system.

Quote from: Calum
even if you're renting you've got more rights than if you're using windows.

System Vitals

Paladin9

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 696
  • Kudos: 263
Star Trek
« Reply #21 on: 20 July 2004, 08:43 »
quote:
Originally posted by M. O'Brien:
The ST people want to get Shatner guest starring in Enterprise.


And now it has been confirmed that Brent Spiner will have a guest apperance in a 3 episode mini arc.  I think he is going to play a ancestor of doctor Dr. Noonien Soong.

 
quote:
Originally posted by M. O'Brien:
ARGH.


Why do you say that?  I think this is a good thing.  It will finally make the show feel like it is related to the other star trek shows at all.
_________________________________________________
 
To create a new standard, it takes something that's not just a little bit different; it takes something that's really new and really captures people's imagination

mobrien_12

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,138
  • Kudos: 711
    • http://www.geocities.com/mobrien_12
Star Trek
« Reply #22 on: 22 July 2004, 00:39 »
Well, Enterprise is pretty much dead.  Several weeks ago, Paramount decided to reduce the number of episodes for the next season. I just read in USA today that they are also going to move it to a 9 pm slot on Friday night.  

Wasn't this exactly the time slot that killed TOS?
In brightest day, in darkest night, no evil shall escape my sight....

hm_murdock

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,629
  • Kudos: 378
  • The Lord of Thyme
Star Trek
« Reply #23 on: 22 July 2004, 01:20 »
quote:
Why do you say that? I think this is a good thing. It will finally make the show feel like it is related to the other star trek shows at all.


that's NOT GOOD.

Enterprise seems to me to be a re-invention of Star Trek. It's as much an "alternate reality" as it is anything. There are things that they have and have happened in the show that cannot be reconciled. Their level of technology is stupid when compared with TOS (did you know that they used LASERS up until a decade before TOS because phasers didn't put out enough damage?).

Enterprise is fun to watch, and IMHO, still a great show. I will never accept that it is in any way historically accurate. It spits in the face of Mike Okuda's Trek history.
Go the fuck ~

Refalm

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,183
  • Kudos: 704
  • Sjembek!
    • RADIOKNOP
Star Trek
« Reply #24 on: 22 July 2004, 02:53 »
quote:
Paladin: 7 was good.  8 WAS BY FAR THE BEST FUCKING STAR TREK MOVIE!!!!  9 was ok.  10 was ok.


4 and 8 remain my favourites, but I haven't seen 10 yet...

hm_murdock

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,629
  • Kudos: 378
  • The Lord of Thyme
Star Trek
« Reply #25 on: 22 July 2004, 03:52 »
1,2,5,6 rule them all.
Go the fuck ~

mobrien_12

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,138
  • Kudos: 711
    • http://www.geocities.com/mobrien_12
Star Trek
« Reply #26 on: 22 July 2004, 05:31 »
quote:
Originally posted by JimmyJames: GenSTEP Founder:
1,2,5,6 rule them all.


5?  As in Star Trek V:  The Final Frontier AKA Shatner's Folly?
In brightest day, in darkest night, no evil shall escape my sight....

hm_murdock

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,629
  • Kudos: 378
  • The Lord of Thyme
Star Trek
« Reply #27 on: 22 July 2004, 06:11 »
yes. a very well-done film, were it not for budget problems and special FX deficiencies
Go the fuck ~

Paladin9

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 696
  • Kudos: 263
Star Trek
« Reply #28 on: 24 July 2004, 05:51 »
quote:
Originally posted by JimmyJames: GenSTEP Founder:
1,2,5,6 rule them all.


Holy fuck... are you serious?  1 and 5????  Not only is it stange that you like those two movies at all, but you actually say that they are better than 4 or 8???  Wow.

Refalm is right.  4 and 8 do rule.
_________________________________________________
 
To create a new standard, it takes something that's not just a little bit different; it takes something that's really new and really captures people's imagination