Miscellaneous > The Lounge
Star Trek
cahult:
quote:Originally posted by Refalm:
One thing I didn't like about every Star Trek was the "extra syndrome". You can see clear examples of this in season 1 of Voyager (in other seasons, they casted an extra in a few episodes first, before he/she got killed).
For example, the captain and the staff and someone you've never seen before go on an away mission. They encounter a hostile species. Now guess who's going to be killed first?
I always hated that BS in Star Trek.
--- End quote ---
Hmm, Bones was killed in one episode, but brought back to life....
Paladin9:
quote:Originally posted by Refalm:
One thing I didn't like about every Star Trek was the "extra syndrome". You can see clear examples of this in season 1 of Voyager (in other seasons, they casted an extra in a few episodes first, before he/she got killed).
For example, the captain and the staff and someone you've never seen before go on an away mission. They encounter a hostile species. Now guess who's going to be killed first?
I always hated that BS in Star Trek.
--- End quote ---
Ha! So true.
quote:Originally posted by JimmyJames:
uh... you're right. Harve Bennett produced ST 2, 3, 4, 5. they were the best ever. Trek was never better. no stupid ass technobabble, no contrivances... no cliches. just a dramatic story. the equipment didn't matter.
blame it on the royal fucktards (Roddenberry and Berman) to create the crappy, cliche, technobabble-filled crapfest that was TNG
as for Roddenberry... he created it, but he didn't give a shit about it. he was lazy. he didn't even want to say what year "Star Trek" happened in.
weak
--- End quote ---
That is what you think. 1 just totally sucked ass. All those people who liked it have a bad taste for movies. I do not understand why people liked 2 so much. It was not that great. 3 sucked except for that fact that it had Christopher Lloyd as a klingon. That was cool. 4 was awesome. 5 was nothing but masturbation. What was the point of 5? Since when does the Enterprise-A have 78 decks? Unless you like seeing mccoy eat "marshmellons" and kirk and spock hug in front of klingons, this movies sucked. 6 was good. 7 was good. 8 WAS BY FAR THE BEST FUCKING STAR TREK MOVIE!!!! 9 was ok. 10 was ok.
Jimmy, how come you mention 5 as one of the "best", but not 6? Dont tell me you like 5 more then 6???
hm_murdock:
the 78-deck thing is a known duff.
did you also notice that the decks counted up from the bottom?
also, the brig is on like deck 7, near the base of the saucer... not at the bottom of the ship
mobrien_12:
quote:Originally posted by JimmyJames: GenSTEP Founder:
the 78-deck thing is a known duff.
did you also notice that the decks counted up from the bottom?
--- End quote ---
Also, there is no way to climb up a single vertical shaft from the bottom of the ship to the top of it.
[ July 19, 2004: Message edited by: M. O'Brien ]
mobrien_12:
The ST people want to get Shatner guest starring in Enterprise.
ARGH.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version