Author Topic: Shame, Shame, Shame!  (Read 1674 times)

slave

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,136
  • Kudos: 0
    • http://www.fuckmicrosoft.com
Shame, Shame, Shame!
« on: 30 October 2002, 21:11 »
According to the W3C HTML Validation Service fuckmicrosoft.com doesn't validate as HTML 3.2.

aapl

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
  • Kudos: 0
Shame, Shame, Shame!
« Reply #1 on: 30 October 2002, 14:10 »
Thanks for looking away for a few minutes. Your girl was fantastic. New meaning to open source, I suppose.

Kintaro

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 6,545
  • Kudos: 255
  • I want to get the band back together!
    • JohnTate.org
Shame, Shame, Shame!
« Reply #2 on: 30 October 2002, 14:16 »
She was fantastic, never before have i seen a chick so willing to flash her flange on a webcam. Its not really a flash. It was out for 5 minutes.

preacher

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 858
  • Kudos: 107
    • http://kansascity.cjb.net
Shame, Shame, Shame!
« Reply #3 on: 30 October 2002, 16:59 »
Well I guess badconnections.net doesnt follow w3c standards either.Apparently I have no character encoding. Also:

Fatal Error: no document type declaration; will parse without validation

Simply put maybe if Im bored one day Ill get my site up to standards.
Kansas City Hustle
http://kansascity.cjb.net

Master of Reality

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,249
  • Kudos: 177
    • http://www.bobhub.tk
Shame, Shame, Shame!
« Reply #4 on: 30 October 2002, 17:41 »
i havent found a webpage where that validator works. Every line of my website isnt up to standards. It says that /html (took off thingys) should have been at the top of the page?????!!!
Disorder | Rating
Paranoid: Moderate
Schizoid: Moderate
Linux User #283518
'It takes more than a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the head to stop Bob'

Gooseberry Clock

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 419
  • Kudos: 0
    • http://redrangersoftware.cjb.net/
Shame, Shame, Shame!
« Reply #5 on: 30 October 2002, 17:46 »
As long as you remember to close every tag you open, your site is as valid as valid can be.

voidmain

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,605
  • Kudos: 184
    • http://voidmain.is-a-geek.net/
Shame, Shame, Shame!
« Reply #6 on: 30 October 2002, 23:44 »
quote:
Originally posted by The Master of Reality / B0B:
i havent found a webpage where that validator works. Every line of my website isnt up to standards. It says that /html (took off thingys) should have been at the top of the page?????!!!


Maybe the validator took one look at your code and was making a joke by saying: "Maybe when you thought about writing a web page you should have 'ended' that thought before 'starting' it."

[ October 30, 2002: Message edited by: void main ]

Someone please remove this account. Thanks...

CommonSense

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21
  • Kudos: 0
    • http://www.microsuck.com
Shame, Shame, Shame!
« Reply #7 on: 1 November 2002, 08:08 »
quote:
Originally posted by Windows XP User #5225982375:
According to the W3C HTML Validation Service fuckmicrosoft.com doesn't validate as HTML 3.2.


A LOT of sites don't validate.  These "validation" services have outlived their usefulness.  As I learned in the real world of working on Fortune 500 corporate websites (British Airways, anyone?  Texaco?  Met Life?  How about American Express?), the best way to make sure your site is OK is to check it on a variety of browser and platform combos.

You were saying?

Pissed_Macman

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,499
  • Kudos: 0
    • http://www.macrevolution.tk
Shame, Shame, Shame!
« Reply #8 on: 1 November 2002, 21:17 »
if this were ihateapple.com winxpee luser would have been banned sooo long ago for talking smack like that.

voidmain

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,605
  • Kudos: 184
    • http://voidmain.is-a-geek.net/
Shame, Shame, Shame!
« Reply #9 on: 1 November 2002, 21:22 »
Microsoft's site is so FAQed up the validator can't even parse it!


microsoft.com validation
Someone please remove this account. Thanks...