Miscellaneous > The Lounge

Iraqs new flag

<< < (10/19) > >>

solarismka:

quote:quote:http://www.iraqbodycount.net/


    quote:Civilians reported killed by military intervention in Iraq
    Min Max
    9451 11333


...Yet you continue to say that millions are dead.

--- End quote ---



Yep.  I'd say thats an estimate.  There are also many that are unaccounted for as well.  So yes millions.  But even then.  Whether it be millions or thousands its still wrong!

 
quote:
    quote:gen

Stilly:

quote:Originally posted by -=Solaris.M.K.A=-:

To deny this is far worse.  If you deny this then yes you deny the holocost.  Because the more exuses you make up the more you could easily take those exuses and put it towards WWII! There is a definnete reason why Hitler has wrong as it is today, there is a definnite reason why bush is wrong.  

--- End quote ---


whats the difference between that statement saying that if you support bush you're a nazi and anyone against the war is a terrorist?

solarismka:

quote:Originally posted by The Stiller:


whats the difference between that statement saying that if you support bush you're a nazi and anyone against the war is a terrorist?
--- End quote ---


Because bush and hitler are the ones that are actually killing people with the same exuses.

I really don't understand.  If a murderer was to kill one person then that is a cause to punnish him/her but if a leader does it, then its fine?

Or to put it this way.  If a leader of a nother country kills a few people he is called a facist dictaor but if the U.S. does the same thing then  its not?

[ June 30, 2004: Message edited by: -=Solaris.M.K.A=- ]

Stilly:

quote:Originally posted by -=Solaris.M.K.A=-:

Because bush and hitler are the ones that are actually killing people with the same exuses.

--- End quote ---

oh so its okay to call people nazis?

here is my impression of what you're saying, "if you support bush you're a nazi"

but then you say its wrong that bush says, "if you dont support the war you're a terrorist"

and by the way, he didn't say you were a terrorist for not supporting the war. new polls are saying more than half the us thinks we shouldn't have been in iraq. if he did he would alienate the half the people here and lose at least half the possible votes.

solarismka:

quote:Originally posted by The Stiller:

oh so its okay to call people nazis?

here is my impression of what you're saying, "if you support bush you're a nazi"
--- End quote ---


That is what YOU are saying.

That is NOT what I am saying.  People who support Hitler are Nazi's people who follow hitlers ideals and value system are Nazi's.

Why because That is what hitler's intention was.  To bring up people that believe in Nazism and follow his principles.

We know this because of the course of history.  We know what a 'Nazi' is and does.  Just by what theuy had done throught history.

Again we have a goverment that is following that principle and value system.  Creating that exact attmoshere and we have the same followers.  Because all of this has already happend there is now a fundamental definnition to go by.  The main reason for the definnition is in fact that they have both created chaos by that of fear using the same techniques.

   
quote:
but then you say its wrong that bush says, "if you dont support the war you're a terrorist"

--- End quote ---


Yes.  This is because bush, like hitler is the instigator of this war.  He is the cause.  There is anough evedence on this now.

Do not think for a second I'm just throwing this definition around.  It is being used properly!  Unlike the word 'terrorism.'  Which used to mean any goverment and/or people that puts fear into ordinary people.  




5. Definition of Nazism (begginers)
Nazism derives its name from the German initials for the Nazionalsozialist party (National Socialist), and the Nationalsozialismus ideology.



It should be pointed at this stage, that despite it

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version