quote:
Originally posted by cahult:
Me too. I like the ones which are dead today, like hittite or gaulish. They have lots to teach us about how we have developed from there to here.
Really nice link that's going in my bookmarks. Why was Yiddish in there? Or not, is this a mistake? I thought that Yiddish was an Aramaic language.
Anyway I agree with you, language (and history) is very important, fascinating as well.
English place names for example, can tell you a lot about the history of the British landscape. We have quite a big Nordic influence in the British Isles dating to around 700 - 1000 AD.
Actually the history of the British landscape is a fascinating one, from pre-history, roman through to the industrial revolution, I guess how different cultures view and see the landscape I find interesting. If you asked different cultures at different periods in time what their ideal (or idillic) landscape would be it would vary so much. You know you have this notion in British society of the pleasant green rolling hills, hedges, woods etc... This is a modern view though. In the 16th century this was not the case, it's very tied in with language. I think the notion the British had about the landscape changed dramatically in the 18th century, especially when the romantic poets, well, started romanticising.
An extreme example, take how the Nazis changed the view of the landscape, and the language they used to describe it..... all very interesting..... and now I'm just rambling
[ September 22, 2003: Message edited by: Zardoz ]