Miscellaneous > The Lounge
Hmmm, this is interesting. Do you Linux gurus care to explain?
Zombie9920:
Look at the top 50 list of sites with the longest uptime.
http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.last.html
I noticed that most of the sites are using BSD.
But look at #35. It is running Windows 2000. There is not 1 single site running Linux(any distro) that have managed to make the top 50. If Windows 2000 is so shitty then how did it manage to accomplish what Linux couldn't/can't in a world where Unix/BSD is the king of the hill?
(EDIT)It has been up for 975 days without a reboot. That is pretty damn good. http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?site=209.189.115.26
[ January 22, 2003: Message edited by: Zombie9920 ]
cahult:
yawn...
Zombie9920:
quote:Originally posted by cahult:
yawn...
--- End quote ---
yawn = you can't discredit the obvious truth.
The truth is, if you know what in the hell you are doing with NT it is not bad at all. It isn't unsable, it is very usable and of course there is almost always a Win32 port of any software that you can get(in alot of cases Win32 is the only platform that the software is made for).
Void Main..didn't you say that you measure your uptime in years and your record uptime was something like 465 or 565 days? It looks like that Win2K box has your Linux beaten by a longshot. ;)
cahult:
quote:Originally posted by Zombie9920:
yawn = you can't discredit the obvious truth.
The truth is, if you know what in the hell you are doing with NT it is not bad at all. It isn't unsable, it is very usable and of course there is almost always a Win32 port of any software that you can get(in alot of cases Win32 is the only platform that the software is made for).
--- End quote ---
If you want my opinion: I don
cahult:
BTW, did you have a look at the site in question running win 2000? What a boring site! Larial stats, what is that?
Yuck!
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version