DVD cover

[Refalm]

NTSC sucks.

Anyway, yeah that show was fun. Not as fun as Eek! The Cat, Rocko's Modern Life, Cow & Chicken and Ren & Stimpy, but still awesome.

[skyman8081]

NTSC may suck (Never Twice the Same Color)

but, putting it in PAL or SECAM would render it unwatchable in North America, where NTSC is used.

and NTSC was around before SECAM and PAL anyway.

[WMD]

Isn't PAL only 25fps anyway?  Everything would look like screen movies.  The noticable difference between the two here is for a reason.

[Refalm]

quote:WMD: Isn't PAL only 25fps anyway?  Everything would look like screen movies.  The noticable difference between the two here is for a reason.

I have a VCR that has a switch for NTSC and PAL.
NTSC stores less data on your medium, but loses it's quality, while PAL stores more data, but has a fat superoir quality over NTSC. Anyone with a NTSC and PAL cabable VCR can test this for him/herself.

[KernelPanic]

quote:Originally posted by WMD:
Isn't PAL only 25fps anyway?  Everything would look like screen movies.  The noticable difference between the two here is for a reason.

PAL has more lines per frame so has better resolution/definiton. Your eye doesn't notice the lower fps. The formats only have different framerates because of the way they had to be implemented.