quote:
But you just suggested that it was "theft"; now you're suggesting software "piracy" is bad because it helps the people you're "stealing" the software from?
So, you suggest we all use Microsoft products, then?
Piracy may spread out a product, but whether it helps the company or not depends on its priorities. If, like Microsoft, it intends to monopolise the market first, then force people to buy their products later (bundled with computers, or with DRM, for example), then in some way piracy helps the company, or at least temporarily, because they intend to regain their lost profit.
On the other hand, it doesn't help smaller companies at all, who mightn't ever have a chance to get a monopoly position, or anyone to bundle their products (e.g. Corel). So they work in vain, gain no marketshare and make no profit on their products. Of course, this is only one example amongst many others.
And while Robin Hood helped the poor by stealing from the rich, it still remained theft.
quote:
If on the other hand you're using a stupid propaganda term for sharing then you're mistaken in calling it "theft" or deeming it wrong.
I fail to understand what you mean by 'propaganda'. You seem to suggest that we cannot think for ourselves, just because some of us do not 'share' your opinion, if I may employ that term. How about if I say that 'sharing' is a euphemism for 'theft'? Or perhaps a propaganda term used by the FSF?
[ July 08, 2003: Message edited by: Laukev7 ]