I have a hard time believing that MS zealots would buy that horse hockey. What I fail to understand is why Microsoft sees threats behind every corner, and believes it must bash its competition into submission rather than develop viable alternatives. This kind of paranoid mudslinging is only drawing people away from MS, for good reason. My advice to MS zealots: Linux users manage to get away with a console that's named BASH, and is subsequently battle-hardened from people using that name as their lone offense against Linux, so get some better arguments than "it's not cost-effective" before you EVER enter into an argument over OS viability.
[ June 14, 2004: Message edited by: Midnight Candidate ]