Author Topic: Well isn't THAT disturbing!  (Read 772 times)

Pissed_Macman

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,499
  • Kudos: 0
    • http://www.macrevolution.tk

SpeeDFreaK

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 246
  • Kudos: 109
Well isn't THAT disturbing!
« Reply #1 on: 23 October 2003, 10:44 »
That's wrong man. So, SO WRONG!!
"George Bush says 'we are losing the war on drugs'. Well you know what that implies? There's a war going on, and people on drugs are winning it! Well what does that tell you about drugs? Some smart, creative motherfuckers on that side."  --Bill Hicks

Pissed_Macman

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,499
  • Kudos: 0
    • http://www.macrevolution.tk
Well isn't THAT disturbing!
« Reply #2 on: 23 October 2003, 11:05 »
It's because we're American. We're not used to seeing stuff like that in everyday commercials.

suselinux

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 711
  • Kudos: 30
Well isn't THAT disturbing!
« Reply #3 on: 23 October 2003, 11:12 »
This is a very good argument for premarital sex.

I thought it was a Jewlery comercial in the first few seconds.

Pissed_Macman

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,499
  • Kudos: 0
    • http://www.macrevolution.tk
Well isn't THAT disturbing!
« Reply #4 on: 23 October 2003, 16:08 »
And what exactly did that have to do with phones? Was he going to knock her unconscious with the phone and escape when she came back to bed?

Master of Reality

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,249
  • Kudos: 177
    • http://www.bobhub.tk
Well isn't THAT disturbing!
« Reply #5 on: 23 October 2003, 16:54 »
i dont wnna dl it.. can soemone give me the jist?
Disorder | Rating
Paranoid: Moderate
Schizoid: Moderate
Linux User #283518
'It takes more than a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the head to stop Bob'

Laukev7

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,834
  • Kudos: 495
Well isn't THAT disturbing!
« Reply #6 on: 23 October 2003, 16:55 »
The speaker said 'Think before engaging. Nomad: the cell phone without engagement'. In other words, no subscription. Don't ask me how this works, though, as I know nothing about cell phones.

[ October 23, 2003: Message edited by: Laukev7: Has half Macman's posts ]


tr_one

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 24
  • Kudos: 0
    • http://www.
Well isn't THAT disturbing!
« Reply #7 on: 23 October 2003, 18:45 »
sent to me in an e-mail long ago (don't ask)A Woman

hm_murdock

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,629
  • Kudos: 378
  • The Lord of Thyme
Well isn't THAT disturbing!
« Reply #8 on: 23 October 2003, 19:24 »
we need  things like that in the states.

oh wait... it'd never happen. too many whiny little bitches!!

"that offends me!"

DON'T FUCKING WATCH IT.

"children shouldn't see that!"

Why the fuck not? They're gonna do it one day whether you want 'em to or not. Why try to deny people their humanity. Just fuck off.

"that's immoral!"

HOW?!?

"that's degrading to women!"

Yeah, and I'm Uncle Sam. Piss off feminazis

"that's just wrong"

PROVE IT.

I fucking hate this country's stupid concept of "morality". A nation founded on liberty was the first nation to support silencing the public for the betterment of business. It's also the nation that lets bible thumpers decide what I get to see.

American moral majority,
Go the fuck ~

slave

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1,136
  • Kudos: 0
    • http://www.fuckmicrosoft.com
Well isn't THAT disturbing!
« Reply #9 on: 23 October 2003, 19:47 »
I agree with Darth!

Laukev7

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,834
  • Kudos: 495
Well isn't THAT disturbing!
« Reply #10 on: 23 October 2003, 20:12 »
quote:
I fucking hate this country's stupid concept of "morality". A nation founded on liberty was the first nation to support silencing the public for the betterment of business. It's also the nation that lets bible thumpers decide what I get to see.


I agree. I used to be a bit of a prude in my pre-college days, but now I find all that just insignificant. I think it's stupid to censor everything to 'protect' children. They're going to learn one day or another, anyway, and might be much more traumatised later if kept in the dark.

Of course, that doesn't mean that we should produce pure violence crap just for the sake of it. If there is a truth to see, then it should be seen by everyone, regardless of age.

hm_murdock

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,629
  • Kudos: 378
  • The Lord of Thyme
Well isn't THAT disturbing!
« Reply #11 on: 23 October 2003, 21:49 »
violence is another thing.

I also don't mean that they should show XXX pr0n on prime time TV.

I just mean that the idea that nudity is "immoral" and that sex is a taboo, until you're the "right" age is rather silly.

It always seemed to me to be as much of a status thing as anything. "We're the old guard and we need a way to separate status in as many ways as possible"

"How about by age?"

"Great!"

"How will we do that?"

"Let's constantly work to push the voting and driving age back to 21!"

"Great! That'll mean there's more 18-21 year olds we could send to war... and there's no chance they'll get in a car wreck or vote us out! I love it!"

"Let's make people think that their own bodies are immoral, and that it's wrong to see nudity!"

"PERFECT!! More double standards! God, who we profess to love so dearly, made us in his own image... we should force people to believe the way we do at every turn... and then use those beliefs to control them! You're a genius!"

"I know. I'm a born-again... I'm perfect!"

"Oh, ha ha ha!! I forgot, we all are!"

But then, these people adamantly believe in a religion that's filled with gotchas and catch-22s.

disclaimer:
BTW, by no means does every Christian fit this description. so unless you love Jerry Fallwell, or tell everybody that they're "gonna burn in hayyulll" if they don't follow the Bible to the letter (impossible to do), then it's not about you.

I ROCK
Go the fuck ~

solarismka

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 598
  • Kudos: 0
Well isn't THAT disturbing!
« Reply #12 on: 24 October 2003, 00:12 »
quote:
Originally posted by Darth Jimmy James:
violence is another thing.

I also don't mean that they should show XXX pr0n on prime time TV.

I just mean that the idea that nudity is "immoral" and that sex is a taboo, until you're the "right" age is rather silly.

It always seemed to me to be as much of a status thing as anything. "We're the old guard and we need a way to separate status in as many ways as possible"

"How about by age?"

"Great!"

"How will we do that?"

"Let's constantly work to push the voting and driving age back to 21!"

"Great! That'll mean there's more 18-21 year olds we could send to war... and there's no chance they'll get in a car wreck or vote us out! I love it!"

"Let's make people think that their own bodies are immoral, and that it's wrong to see nudity!"

"PERFECT!! More double standards! God, who we profess to love so dearly, made us in his own image... we should force people to believe the way we do at every turn... and then use those beliefs to control them! You're a genius!"

"I know. I'm a born-again... I'm perfect!"

"Oh, ha ha ha!! I forgot, we all are!"

But then, these people adamantly believe in a religion that's filled with gotchas and catch-22s.

disclaimer:
BTW, by no means does every Christian fit this description. so unless you love Jerry Fallwell, or tell everybody that they're "gonna burn in hayyulll" if they don't follow the Bible to the letter (impossible to do), then it's not about you.

I ROCK




100% totaly agree!!!!!
  :D
"Regime Change" starts at home!<p>Islam IS NOT the enemy! Against American Terrorism since Sept/11/2001<p>Jihad:<p>http://www.islamanswers.net/jihad/meaning.htm <p>new SuSE Linux User!<p><p>If your gonna point a finger at someone then at least have the proof to back you up!<p>trolls are idiots that demand attention by posting whatever is opposite to the theme to ruffle feathers to make people upset!<p>Often these same trolls always mention grammar/spelling since they have no intelligence of their own.

Stilly

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 653
  • Kudos: 29
    • http://kickassshit.tk/
Well isn't THAT disturbing!
« Reply #13 on: 24 October 2003, 06:38 »
jimmy is right on

[ October 23, 2003: Message edited by: The Stiller ]

just say know