Miscellaneous > Programming & Networking
32 hour clock
Master of Reality:
http://forum.fuckmicrosoft.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=7&t=000431
Master of Reality:
its now:
2002:199:00:02:08
lazygamer:
Not to put this topic off-topic, but MOR is being a heretic(again). Learning how to program C is something that requires INTELLECT and BRAINS. When you join Bob you choose to lose those abilties in order to achieve a utopia.
Stryker:
for compiling I usually find a standard 'make filenamewithout.c-or.cpp' to work well, for instance:
there is a file named test.cpp i want to compile
make test
I find the other way to lead to a lot more errors (at least in my cases).
voidmain:
Stryker, "make" is not a compiler, it's a project management utility that requires a "Makefile" (make script) which calls the compiler (such as gcc). It determines which files in your project need to be compiled and which are up to date. For a small single file program you just call the compiler directly, although you could create a Makefile for it, but that is an extra step not really needed for an example like this.. If the project grew into multiple source/header/library files then yes, you would want to create a Makefile and use "make" to manage the project.
[ August 23, 2002: Message edited by: VoidMain ]
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version