heh, this is why must people or companies dont trust microsoft..
I don't see how this conclusion logically follows. After all, it seems that MS responded quickly to the needs of the customer in this case. Now, it may inconvenience the home user should SP2 break applications. In a corporate setting, it's understandable that IT managers would want to do test installs before deploying on a corporate-wide network.
What I have a problem with is the fact that MS doesn't seem to draw a distinction between the corporate user and the home user. While it is helpful to atechnological home users (I received a NEC system from these neighbors that had Win 98SE installed. Upon booting it up, I discovered that this sytem had a Norton AV that had never received an update since the subscription expired, and the last disk defrag had been done 864 days prior) to do for them what they can/will not do for themselves, why would they treat their corporate customers as if they were equally clueless? Why not leave these decisions up to supposedly "professional" IT managers to take care of this in their own good time?
Aren't these people being paid to make these decisions? :eek:
