All Things Microsoft > Microsoft Software
How to make your Windows machine more stable and secure
skyman8081:
I am laughing because my post got completly ingored in this thread, heh.
muzzy:
--- Quote from: skyman8081 ---I am laughing because my post got completly ingored in this thread, heh.
--- End quote ---
It didn't. I just didn't have anything to say about it. It's similar to my 2.6.x experiences, and I addressed that already. Thanks for the post, though, it feels nice to have someone else in the forums to confirm that issues with 2.6 indeed exist. Perhaps this will help people see I'm not just blindly ranting.
Orethrius:
You know what crosses my mind, and the reason why most people haven't responded yet? So there was a deviation from a standard by the community that established it. Big deal, it's nothing that Microsoft hasn't done a few hundred times. Oh wait, those would be regulated standards...
WMD:
--- Quote from: skyman8081 ---I am laughing because my post got completly ingored in this thread, heh.
--- End quote ---
Ok. I'm sure 2.4.0 worked (didn't work) just as well as 2.6.0.
And look what 2.4 is now. ;)
skyman8081:
why they decided to rename the driver for my NIC to the chipset, instead of the card, is beyond me...
All it did was make it a pain in the ASS to compile for me.
and why did it mysteriously stop booting, when the root partition's filesystem was installed, and not a module?
the very fact that compiling the karnel requires something like make xconfig/menuconfig is a testament to its own feature-bloat.
and we all know that the bread and butter linux apps, are not bloated.
right?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version