Operating Systems > macOS

Tiger VS xp VS Linux

(1/1)

cahult:
Mac OS X Tiger is only a few days old yet already tests have been done. Here

mobrien_12:
Not really a test.... more of an opinion piece, but interesting nonetheless.

WMD:
They mention that Tiger took features from Longhorn.  Apparently nobody pays enough attention.  For Spotlight to be copied from Longhorn into Tiger, Apple would've needed to have a working demo completed in a matter of months, maybe weeks.

adiment:
Why compare it to MS64-bit? Windows XP 64-bit it crap right now with shit driver support. It doesn't even give a performance boost becuase nothing is written in 64-bit for it. It's like comparing a bmw to a ford.

Windows 64-bit not designed for the home user and for CAD? Are microsoft complete idiots? The only 64-bit CPU's are AMD, and AMD's are much worse performance wise in things like CAD, 3d modeling, video encoding. But AMD's do very well in gaming against Intels.

I think tiger wins this one. But in my opinion Linux does because it doens't need an apple to run on.

Navigation

[0] Message Index