Miscellaneous > Programming & Networking

Create your own language

(1/5) > >>

cheatscanner:
Im not that stupid! I mean programming language... that is downloadable... and only those who have the program can decode it and use the programs created by other users of that program, but not able to edit it.
 
Make one in competition to MS-VB!

Aloone_Jonez:
It's called XBasic although I haven't tried it.

What programming a languages have you used before?

By the way would some mod move this to programming & networking.

Lord C:
Moved to Programming & Networking.

Aloone_Jonez:
There's also FreeBasic not an alternative to Visual Basic I know but Microsoft QuickBasic. Who knows may be one day it might form part of a Visual Basic like language if they ever implement GUI support.

muzzy:

--- Quote from: cheatscanner ---Im not that stupid! I mean programming language... that is downloadable... and only those who have the program can decode it and use the programs created by other users of that program, but not able to edit it.
 
Make one in competition to MS-VB!
--- End quote ---


So, what was the original context for this message? Where does it moved from? Because, you know, this doesn't make any damn sense.

"Im not that stupid!" sounds like he's replying to something. What? The continuation is broken, does anyone expect there will be meaningful discussion as a result of something like this?

Also, the specifications for the "language" are gibberish, or just plain wrong. It sounds like he wants a bytecode language, which you can only run if you have the VM application, or any similar design. However, bytecode can be disassembled too, and if there's only one compiler and the bytecode is highlevel, it'll very quickly result in a decompiler being written as well. Well, if a real programmer ever finds the language and feels like writing one, anyway.

So, what's the meaning of "but not able to edit it"? Does it just mean "compiled, not interpreted"? Also, what's the purpose of this all? Competition to VB? Wouldn't all programming languages be in similar position anyway, assuming they were worthwhile, or is the intent to create a programming language targeted for the same people that use VB today?

This post just raises more and more questions, and I have no idea what's the point of any of it. If there is something to discuss here, could mr. cheatscanner please elaborate on the original post?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page