All Things Microsoft > Microsoft as a Company

Vista Requirments: wtf?

<< < (3/6) > >>

Aloone_Jonez:
WMD, this proves to me that this whole article is complete and utter bullcrap. I'd stoped reading before I got to this point, now it's totally lost the smallest bit of credibility it had.

piratePenguin:

--- Quote from: Jack2000 ---Muhahahhahahahha "}

Told you .. :Pp

But you would not listen now would you!!!!!
But noooooo instead you come and say ooh the big bad M$ is gona take our cash

You should have listen to the guy with internal sources(hell every bulgarian is going to tell you everything (as long as you are bulgarian too))

Now suck on M$ big rocket or revert to 98 \ Unix
--- End quote ---
Wha?

Jack2000:
I said that i informed all of you about vista but back then you just ignored me

piratePenguin:

--- Quote from: Jack2000 ---I said that i informed all of you about vista but back then you just ignored me
--- End quote ---
Oh.
I saw "Pp" and thought you were referring to me (after a few reads, even).
I still don't know what posts/threads you're talking about though.

adiment:

--- Quote from: Refalm ---You know, I had a choice when I bought parts for my computer.

I choose IDE instead of SATA. So now I can't use Windows Vista (not that I wanted to anyway) because I have IDE? Fuck that!

Also, Microsoft is going to upset quite some gamers by making the desktop OpenGL'ed and requirering 256 MB of video memory to run properly!
Microsoft is fucking nuts!
--- End quote ---

It'll still work [like crap] on systems that don't meet MS's requirments. My friend tried the beta and it took 700mbs of ram just to idle on desktop. :scared:

SATA isn't even worth it for for the extra 17mbps of transfer. PATA 133 is not far from SATA, PATA HDD's with 16mb cache are almost as good as the best SATA drive (10,000rpm Raptor, 74gb, 8mb cache), not to mention much cheaper.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page